KingBran
Three Eyed Raven
- Apr 24, 2014
- 6,436
- 2,284
Yeah this game was on Allen
Giving up 4 PP goals and spending almost an entire period in the penalty box sure had nothing to do with it. Yeah lets blame the goalie!
Last edited:
Yeah this game was on Allen
Giving up 4 PP goals and spending almost an entire period in the penalty box sure had nothing to do with it. Yeah lets blame the goalie!
Allen looked like crap. The whole team looked like crap but Allen played his fecal part
I don't care who was in net last night, the Blues lose.
Don't think you can blame the goalie at all for last night. But... it's the Blues so people just blame the goalie when the rest of the team doesn't show up.
Not saying Allen was stellar or anything but IMO just does not deserve ANY blame for last night.
Allen's rebound control wasn't very good, he wasn't tracking the puck well, and his reaction speed was off.
You can blame whoever you want but Allen has had a rough week.
I guess we can agree to disagree. Cannot expect a shutout every game, goals are going to happen. All the penalties and awful defense last night is what killed us.
^^ The fourth and fifth goals were bad goals (five hole and a horrible short sider)...the third wasn't so hot either and his rebound control was poor all night. Allen had a bad night.
Taking too many penalties..well, that;s always been a problem for this team under Hitch (and I hope one that is remedied in the offseason). The goalie however is still expected to play well and he didn't last night.
So the penalties are OK because that's "always been a problem for this team under Hitch" but the goalie(s) who are a huge reason we are where we are in the standings deserve lots of blame for a game where the players were in the box for over 1/3 of the game?
I am sure that you are not excusing the penalties but that's the impression you are giving. Just chalking it up to 'that's just the way it is' and throwing blame at the goalie.
The Blues have only a +6 goal differential but sit tied for 2nd place in the entire league. Every single other division leader (top 3 in each) is at least a +20 except for NYR (+17). The biggest reason we are where we are is because of Allen and Elliott.
So when I see a game like this, when the Blues allow 4 PP goals and sit in the box for 1/3 of the game I just cannot put any blame on the goalie. Just can't. They don't deserve it and watching the game, the team in front played much worse than Allen.
Am i the only one who is not overly concerned? They've shown consistently that they have difficulty getting hyped for bad teams. I much rather go in as a 2-3 seed, and play the Stars/Hawks in the first round.
My problem is that they specifically noted this being a problem. Got lit up by Calgary and we heard the same rhetoric. So we should expect a bounce back in Edmonton....well they bounced alright.
This team lacks mental focus. The blown leads and this lack of being prepared show that.
So basically you can't admit Allen has been letting in goals he shouldn't be and most of them were the difference between having to pull him and let in an empty netter or getting lit up when the other team has an extra attacker? Duly noted.
So the penalties are OK because that's "always been a problem for this team under Hitch" but the goalie(s) who are a huge reason we are where we are in the standings deserve lots of blame for a game where the players were in the box for over 1/3 of the game?
I am sure that you are not excusing the penalties but that's the impression you are giving. Just chalking it up to 'that's just the way it is' and throwing blame at the goalie.
The Blues have only a +6 goal differential but sit tied for 2nd place in the entire league. Every single other division leader (top 3 in each) is at least a +20 except for NYR (+17). The biggest reason we are where we are is because of Allen and Elliott.
So when I see a game like this, when the Blues allow 4 PP goals and sit in the box for 1/3 of the game I just cannot put any blame on the goalie. Just can't. They don't deserve it and watching the game, the team in front played much worse than Allen.
I'm cherry-picking stats by comparing the Blues to all other top 3 division leaders in the entire league while you just compare them to LA and CHI? Yeaaaahhhh.....You are really cherry picking your stats. We are on par with goals scored with the Hawks and the Kings but we lag the Hawks slightly and the Kings by a lot in goals against.
I'm not excusing the penalty minutes but think a significant change in that department will require a different coach...some of that is on the coach--it's a fundamental that need to be drilled and emphasized.
The goaltender is the most important position on the ice...if the goalie has a bad night, you tend to lose. We scored 4 goals...that should be enough to win 90% of the time. Most every goalie in the league is capable of the big save...it's the ones who do it night in and night out with consistency that distinguish themselves as elite aka reliable. Allen gave up 2 goals that were "bad goals".
Elliott has been superb this year-the best I've seen him play in his recent streak of play. Allen has tailed off considerably and is showing the same types of valleys that seem to have plagued him his entire career...great peaks--yes..but too many valleys. We'll see if he can turn it around.
I'm cherry-picking stats by comparing the Blues to all other top 3 division leaders in the entire league while you just compare them to LA and CHI? Yeaaaahhhh.....
....
Anyways, You are right, scoring 4 should be enough to win. Playing 1/3 of the game on the PK is not good enough to win. Even with 4 goals, it's a tossup. Just like it was last night.
Allen and Elliott have both played fantastic this season and both have at one point lead the league in GAA and SV%. I will never understand this mentality of you have to like one or the other. I personally like both of them and have the upmost confidence in both Allen and Elliott. The problem with this team is their scoring and their system with a dash of weak mental toughness.
Allen just won 6 in a row after missing a month and before he was injured he was among the best in the league and at point leading all goalies in stats. The Blues lay a couple clunkers (as a TEAM) and suddenly Allen is the bad-guy again and has "tailed off"
Sorry but 6-2-0 after missing a month due to injury is not tailing off. That's pretty good actually.
But keep harping on our goalie please. I will be sure to let you know that Elliott has "tailed off" after he loses just two in a row with the team playing like this in front of him next time it happens.
You are really cherry picking your stats. We are on par with goals scored with the Hawks and the Kings but we lag the Hawks slightly and the Kings by a lot in goals against.
I'm not excusing the penalty minutes but think a significant change in that department will require a different coach...some of that is on the coach--it's a fundamental that need to be drilled and emphasized.
The goaltender is the most important position on the ice...if the goalie has a bad night, you tend to lose. We scored 4 goals...that should be enough to win 90% of the time. Most every goalie in the league is capable of the big save...it's the ones who do it night in and night out with consistency that distinguish themselves as elite aka reliable. Allen gave up 2 goals that were "bad goals".
Elliott has been superb this year-the best I've seen him play in his recent streak of play. Allen has tailed off considerably and is showing the same types of valleys that seem to have plagued him his entire career...great peaks--yes..but too many valleys. We'll see if he can turn it around.