Nucker101
Foundational Poster
- Apr 2, 2013
- 21,320
- 16,978
Value of: Best offer for Tanev
- Thread starter Tom sestito
- Start date
JuniorNelson
Registered User
Generous offer.
Tanev is a better player than he appears to be on paper. He has been paired with guys that need defensive babysitting and has had to do a lot by himself. If he went to a team with a good scheme he'd improve his numbers.
Younger but ideally a player of his Calibre or with potential.
The OP says for a winger which I disagree with entirely I would want either a younger RD with top four potential or a top 6 centre or prospect with potential. Depending on who these players are we would want draft picks to even out the value.
Last edited:
Our defensive core desperately needs that right handed defensive defenceman and Tanev is probably the best/most realistic player in the league for that role for us. We can always try and re-sign JVR to a decent contract (if he is willing to), or give other young guys a chance to play there.
I don't think Kapanen and a late 1st round draft pick in a terrible draft is too much. It'll suck losing Kapanen but that's the cost of getting another quality player in return.
SHANNYPLAN
Registered User
- Nov 24, 2016
- 5,227
- 2,609
KarmaPolice
Snack enthusiast
Would you take Nurse for Ceci+2nd?
Oiler pairings for next season:
Klefbom - Larsson
Sekera - Ceci
Reinhart - Benning
I really like Nurse, but with Klefbom blossoming into a top pairing Dman this season, and Sekera having an incredibly consistent year at both ends and of the ice -- and BOTH of those two being signed long-term -- I don't feel there's going to be room for Nurse in the top-4, even though he very likely to at least be a very effective 2nd pairing Dman within the next couple of seasons if he gets those minutes, and certainly could be more. Ceci just fits better for us and what we need going forward.
Jared Dunn
Registered User
He's an AHL body that could potentially bump up to a bottom pairing D. He has next to no value, which is kind of the point with a throw in??
But keep being condescending
From Boston we'd probably have to start with looking at Frederic+. McAvoy is a non-starter, but aside from that, there isn't a really a super-enticing prospect at the centerpiece.
Frederic + Zboril/1st? Something around there, with added pieces balancing off.
This just doesn't really make sense for Canucks. JVR just isn't going to change our fortunes. We're not good, and adding him won't make us good. He's a player a contending team would be looking to add.
Then after a season he walks? Just not much incentive for the Canucks. The JV "throw-in" is insult to injury.
ON3M4N
Ignores/60 = Elite
No thanks. I don't really think Boston would have a need for Tanev. We have Carlo, McAvoy is coming next season and we still have the Miller boys and McQuaid. I'd give you Koko's rights + EDM 2nd, maybe throw in Morrow's RFA rights as well.
Alexander Edler
Registered User
Lets Change this to a young Winger U25 that is top 6 (no one is going to offer anything) so lets just not trade tanev.
IPreferPi
A Nonny Mouse
Aladyyn
they praying for the death of a rockstar
ON3M4N
Ignores/60 = Elite
That's my point, Boston doesn't have a desperate need for Tanev so we have no need to give up anything substantial. I honestly don't understand why Canucks fans want to trade Tanev so bad. He's only 26 and sign to a pretty team friendly deal, but there are numerous trade threads about him lol.
Honestly, I would love this guy on the Leafs. One of the best defensive defenceman in the league.
What are some comparable players who have been traded and what have been their return?
I'm fine with his lack of offense...let's face it, he brings no offense at all. But it's his proneness to injury that would worry me. Tanev is as close to a guarantee non-full season as you can get. If I were a GM, that is absolutely a consideration when it comes to what I'd be willing to part with in order to get him. That alone will make nuck fans hate whatever proposal I'd come up with because right or wrong, they're likely not going to consider his injury history when it comes to his trade value.
What are some comparable players who have been traded and what have been their return?
I'm fine with his lack of offense...let's face it, he brings no offense at all. But it's his proneness to injury that would worry me. Tanev is as close to a guarantee non-full season as you can get. If I were a GM, that is absolutely a consideration when it comes to what I'd be willing to part with in order to get him. That alone will make nuck fans hate whatever proposal I'd come up with because right or wrong, they're likely not going to consider his injury history when it comes to his trade value.
Its not bad, Pick is a little late basically a 2nd and Duclairs value IMO is low after the poor year he has had.
IPreferPi
A Nonny Mouse
MIN may get eliminated in the first round. Duke's had a poor season but he's been scoring again once Tippett finally relented on putting him back on a line with a skilled playmaker (Domi). He should be able to produce for you if he were paired with Baertchi or Goldobin.
Mind you, I see no reason why the Canucks would trade Tanev, who is only 26 and on a good contract. Certainly don't see them trading him within the division if it came to it, either.
Because we suck.
We're going to waste his prime years miring in the league basement. For a contending team with a need on the backend, his deal is an asset.
And for a rebuilding team, that makes him one of our few tradeable assets.
FOurteenS inCisOr
FOS COrp CEO
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
-
GDT: WCF | GM2 | Dallas Stars vs. Edmonton Oilers | 7:00PM CT | TNT- Latest: Matty Sundin
-
