Everyone blames Lowe and for good reason. I agree that he has been the one solid constant that has drug down the franchise for a decade. Nonetheless, who hired him and why did they do so? It is well documented that Sather left because of a growing rift between him and the revamped EIG leadership group along with a salary dispute. Lowe was then promoted from coach for no reason other than of his contributions as a player and he came really cheap. Perhaps Cal Nichols was the original enabler of the OBC, hoping that keeping a connection to the Boys on the Bus would publicly lessen the sting of losing Sather. EIG also gutted the organizations prospect development program by not wanting to pay for a dedicated AHL franchise. We have paid for that decision dearly.
Katz stepped in and at least added money to the equation; however, he doubled-down on OBC connections of Lowe and MacT and erred giving them too much rope after the 2006 miracle SCF run. Plenty of blame to go around this past decade, and yet let's not foist this solely on Katz. He promoted Lowe out of the hockey group, which is the way past NHL pariahs have been removed (e.g., Clarke, Pulford).
Yes, I want evidence of what Belanger is taking about when he makes these vague claims that he tried to be a leader. I interview plenty of candidates who claim they are hard workers. In fact, almost everyone claims this at some point. The difference being that the real hard-workers can always cite numerous, tangible examples of how they have worked hard in the past. If Belanger's yearly Twitter rant is any indication, he will have a difficult time expanding his argument beyond appealing to his authority.