Anybody willing to take this bum or are the Rangers stuck with his contract?
3 years remaining @ $3.6m
3 years remaining @ $3.6m
He took a bad penalty and you immediately rushed to post this?Anybody willing to take this bum or are the Rangers stuck with his contract?
3 years remaining @ $3.6m
He's had a bad couple of years and I've made this thread before.He took a bad penalty and you immediately rushed to post this?
And how did it go before?He's had a bad couple of years and I've made this thread before.
A year ago other fans said they were willing to take a shot on him if he came for free. Now that he's somehow even worse - and by a considerable amount - I'm curious to see if that sentiment remains.And how did it go before?
I think you'll find the sentiment, like Barclay's game, is even worse.A year ago other fans said they were willing to take a shot on him if he came for free. Now that he's somehow even worse - and by a considerable amount - I'm curious to see if that sentiment remains.
Papers are on their wayHmmmmm. 54% on faceoffs. 2nd most shorthanded TOI for a top-10 PK team. Wears an A. Has won a Cup.
Yeah, he's on a bloated contract......but it's one I think the Sabres can manage.
For a 7th? Price seems right for the Sabres.
Psst, you can ask for more and they would likely accept. Like a late pick or to get rid of a salary like Olofsson, Jost or Comrie in return if you feel like it.Hmmmmm. 54% on faceoffs. 2nd most shorthanded TOI for a top-10 PK team. Wears an A. Has won a Cup.
Yeah, he's on a bloated contract......but it's one I think the Sabres can manage.
For a 7th? Price seems right for the Sabres.
ShhhhhhhPsst, you can ask for more and they would likely accept. Like a late pick or to get rid of a salary like Olofsson, Jost or Comrie in return if you feel like it.
We stuck. Thanks Chris.Anybody willing to take this bum or are the Rangers stuck with his contract?
3 years remaining @ $3.6m
I said this over a year ago but this type of player is what Buffalo needs. Gritty in your face will eat a puck to keep it out of the net. You have the scoring and you would be a nightmare to play against with these types of players.Hmmmmm. 54% on faceoffs. 2nd most shorthanded TOI for a top-10 PK team. Wears an A. Has won a Cup.
Yeah, he's on a bloated contract......but it's one I think the Sabres can manage.
For a 7th? Price seems right for the Sabres.
Yes it is.His cap hit isn't THAT bad, but if you need the space a buyout would be the best route (actually generates a small negative hit in 24-25).
I could see a team taking him on at 1/2 retention, at full hit you'd probably need to take a cap dump back.
So the Rangers lose their young defenseman and still end up with less cap space at the deadline than before?Myers (pending UFA) + a 3rd for Goodrow + Schneider
The worst contracts in the league are buyout proof. The only year Goodrow’s buyout penalty exceeds $1.111 million is 26-27, after Trouba and Panarin’s contracts end.Yes it is.
This is low key one of the worst contracts in the league
The worst contracts in the league are the ones giving you no ROI. Goodrow probably has the worst point per dollar ratio in the league, hes gotten worse every year and he still has multiple years of term. This is an atrocious contract. You can't pay over 3m for a 4th linerSo the Rangers lose their young defenseman and still end up with less cap space at the deadline than before?
The worst contracts in the league are buyout proof. The only year Goodrow’s buyout penalty exceeds $1.111 million is 26-27, after Trouba and Panarin’s contracts end.
They benefit from the cap space gained for the next few years. Dumping cap with term is costly.So the Rangers lose their young defenseman and still end up with less cap space at the deadline than before?
The worst contracts in the league are buyout proof. The only year Goodrow’s buyout penalty exceeds $1.111 million is 26-27, after Trouba and Panarin’s contracts end.
Goodrow’s cap hit beyond this year doesn’t really matter if he’s bought-out. The penalty is pretty favorable for the Rangers. If the other option is to give up someone like Schneider then I think it’s pretty clear that the Rangers would opt for a buyout.They benefit from the cap space gained for the next few years. Dumping cap with term is costly.
noEvander Kane for Goodrow and Kakko?
I agree that it’s an awful contract, hence why I think Goodrow should be bought-out this summer. I just don’t think a contract taking up less than 5% of the cap for a player who does provide some value (Goodrow is an objectively good penalty killer) really qualifies as one of the worst in the league.The worst contracts in the league are the ones giving you no ROI. Goodrow probably has the worst point per dollar ratio in the league, hes gotten worse every year and he still has multiple years of term. This is an atrocious contract. You can't pay over 3m for a 4th liner