Athletic NHL99 Countdown

Amazinmets73

Registered User
Dec 1, 2015
1,014
483
All I think it shows is wins/82 is a junk stat. Anyone with familiarity with these players can point that out.
The players with the highest W/82 in hockey history and generally regarded as the best in the sports history. How can we claim it's a junk stat?
 

ChiTownPhilly

Not Too Soft
Feb 23, 2010
2,106
1,391
AnyWorld/I'mWelcomeTo
Orr's wins/82 is significantly higher than Lemieux's. And Lemieux had a relatively short career as well. Few games as an older player to lower his average.
:squints:, :blinks:, :puts on :cool: (cool) corrective lenses:, :blinks:, looks again...

Lemieux production-rate compared, unfavorably, to Orr's production-rate.
Next sentence- Lemieux receives the cautionary ticket for a relatively short career.

Humor? Unintentional irony?! Inside joke?!? [:joker:]
 

Amazinmets73

Registered User
Dec 1, 2015
1,014
483
:squints:, :blinks:, :puts on :cool: (cool) corrective lenses:, :blinks:, looks again...

Lemieux production-rate compared, unfavorably, to Orr's production-rate.
Next sentence- Lemieux receives the cautionary ticket for a relatively short career.

Humor? Unintentional irony?! Inside joke?!? [:joker:]
Yes, obviously Orr had a very short career, hence the "as well" (i.e as well as Orr) in reference to Lemieux's career. My point was that Lemieux played few games past peak production age to lower his average (we all know Orr played 0.) If Lemieux had played 400 or so games from age 34 onwards, I would view his career W/82 quite differently. This would apply to a player such a Messier.
 
Last edited:

ChiTownPhilly

Not Too Soft
Feb 23, 2010
2,106
1,391
AnyWorld/I'mWelcomeTo
Lemieux's NHL career (including playoffs) was 1022 games. Orr's NHL career (including playoffs) was 731 games. If Lemieux's career was [Short], then Orr's career was [(.72) x Short]. There are those who think that Orr's brilliance makes up for nearly 300 less games played. I've staked a different position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sentinel

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
7,737
7,516
Regina, Saskatchewan
Lemieux played 745 games before the 1997 retirement.

Orr played 621 games before the 1976 season.

Lemieux had 10 seasons at 59 or more games. 6 seasons at 70 or more.

Orr had 8 seasons of 59 games or more. 5 seasons at 70 or more.

What does it mean? I dont know
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
13,701
10,336
Lemieux played 745 games before the 1997 retirement.

Orr played 621 games before the 1976 season.

Lemieux had 10 seasons at 59 or more games. 6 seasons at 70 or more.

Orr had 8 seasons of 59 games or more. 5 seasons at 70 or more.

What does it mean? I dont know

It means they both had substantial weaknesses on their resumes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sentinel

Staniowski

Registered User
Jan 13, 2018
3,548
3,118
The Maritimes
He did. He had Lemieux first and Gretzky fifth.
Bowman had Lemieux 4th on that list. I think he's ranked each of Howe, Orr and Lemieux at #1 at various times.

One gripe I have with this list is that playoffs are not considered at all, other than Cups/Smythes for the trophy points (which I don't think affect ranking much). Tough to put much weight in a list that basically omits postseason hockey.
Did they say they're not considering playoffs?
 

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
7,737
7,516
Regina, Saskatchewan
1. Bobby Orr
2. Gordie Howe
3. Maurice Richard
4. Mario Lemieux
5. Wayne Gretzky
6. Doug Harvey
7. Eddie Shore
8. Howie Morenz
9. Jean Beliveau
10. Bobby Hull

 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sentinel

Steven Toast

Registered User
Apr 3, 2019
1,777
2,864
Sol System
The Athletic just released a podcast where some of the voters came on to discuss this list. Listened to in on my commute home. Few interesting points.

Link to Podcast

They all agree Draisaitl not being on the list was a big omission/mistake on their part.

One voter, Shayna Goldman, had Orr ranked #8. Lidstrom was her highest ranked dman. She cited a short career and a easy level of competition for ranking him at 8. This likely swung Lemieux into 2nd place.

One voter, Dom Loosechicken had Messier ranked #30. Citing an easier scoring environment boosting his numbers.

James Mirtle ranked Matthews #52, lowest among all voters.

All ballots will be released on their website soon.
 
Last edited:

The Macho King

Back* to Back** World Champion
Jun 22, 2011
48,863
29,469
The Athletic just released a podcast where some of the voters came on to discuss this list. Listened to in on my commute home. Few interesting points.

Link to Podcast

They all agree Draisaitl not being on the list was a big omission/mistake on their part.

One voter, Shayna Goldman, had Orr ranked #8. Lidstrom was her highest ranked dman. She cited a short career and a easy level of competition for ranking him at 8. This likely swung Lemieux into 2nd place.

One voter, Dom Loosechicken had Messier ranked #30. Citing an easier scoring environment boosting his numbers.

James Mirtle ranked Matthews #52, lowest among all voters.

All ballots will be released on their website soon.
Just a terrible voting pool. Matthews that high (and above current players with far superior resumes) also sticks out like a sore thumb.

And Orr at 8.... Jesus.
 

Hatfield

Registered User
Jan 27, 2007
1,101
1,092
The Athletic just released a podcast where some of the voters came on to discuss this list. Listened to in on my commute home. Few interesting points.

Link to Podcast

They all agree Draisaitl not being on the list was a big omission/mistake on their part.

One voter, Shayna Goldman, had Orr ranked #8. Lidstrom was her highest ranked dman. She cited a short career and a easy level of competition for ranking him at 8. This likely swung Lemieux into 2nd place.

One voter, Dom Loosechicken had Messier ranked #30. Citing an easier scoring environment boosting his numbers.

James Mirtle ranked Matthews #52, lowest among all voters.

All ballots will be released on their website soon.

The Goldman lady seems to have purposefully set her ranking to remove Orr from the #2 spot.

I’ve never heard of any hockey person ranking Orr outside the top 4, much less at #8.

Sure, he had a short career, but he managed to cram in a lot of Norrises, Harts, and Stanleys. Lemieux had a short career too!
 

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
7,737
7,516
Regina, Saskatchewan
797d26cc0fae978aaefdec7f0a8f22712776c78c.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: thegoldenyear

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
7,737
7,516
Regina, Saskatchewan
Defensemen

RankingPlayerHoH listDifference
1Bobby Orr10
2Nick Lidstrom3+1
3Ray Bourque2-1
4Paul Coffey8+4
5Denis Potvin4-1
6Larry Robinson5-1
7Chris Chelios6-1
8Brian Leetch16+8
9Chris Pronger90
10Al MacInnis11+1
11Scott Niedermayer20+9
12Scott Stevens10-2
13Victor Hedman23+10
14Brad Park7-7
15Borje Salming12-3
16Zdeno Chara13-3
17Erik Karlsson170
18Drew Doughty180
19Duncan Keith14-5
20Serge Savard19-1
21Rob Blake25+4
22Shea Weber24+2
23Mark Howe15-8
24Sergei Zubov29+5
25Guy Lapointe21-4
26Kris Letang32+6

Centres

RankingPlayerHoH listDifference
1Wayne Gretzky10
2Mario Lemieux20
3Sidney Crosby30
4Phil Esposito6+2
5Joe Sakic9+4
6Steve Yzerman10+4
7Connor McDavid21+14
8Mark Messier4-4
9Marcel Dionne13+4
10Evgeni Malkin12+2
11Peter Forsberg110
12Bryan Trottier8-4
13Bobby Clarke7-6
14Joe Thornton15+1
15Sergei Fedorov14-1
16Eric Lindros160
17Ron Francis19+2
18Pavel Datsyuk20+2
19Patrice Bergeron25+6
20Stan Mikita*5-15
21Mike Modano24+3
22Dale Hawerchuk26+4
23Peter Stastny18-5
24Mats Sundin29+5
25Auston Matthews41+16
26Jonathan Toews27+1
27Doug Gilmour17-10
28Gilbert Perreault22-6
29Adam Oates23-6
30Jean Ratelle32+2
31Nathan MacKinnon40+9
32Steven Stamkos31-1
33Henrik Sedin39+6
34Joe Nieuwendyk42+8
35Darryl Sittler36+1
36Denis Savard33-3
37Pat LaFontaine43+6
38Henrik Zetterberg29-9
39Anze Kopitar28-11


Wingers
RankingPlayerHoH listDifference
1Jaromir Jagr10
2Alex Ovechkin20
3Mike Bossy4+1
4Guy Lafleur3-1
5Brett Hull7+2
6Teemu Selanne5-1
7Jarome Iginla10+3
8Pavel Bure11+3
9Jari Kurri6-3
10Luc Robitaille16+6
11Patrick Kane8-3
12Paul Kariya120
13Brendan Shanahan21+8
14Martin St. Louis9-5
15Mike Gartner32+17
16Nikita Kucherov18+2
17Daniel Sedin34+17
18Marian Hossa13-6
19Alexander Mogilny29+10
20Mark Recchi15-5
21Bob Gainey25+4
22Johnny Bucyk14-8

Goalies

RankingPlayerHoH listDifference
1Dominik Hasek2+1
2Patrick Roy1-1
3Martin Brodeur30
4Ken Dryden40
5Tony Esposito7+2
6Bernie Parent9+3
7Henrik Lundqvist6-1
8Roberto Luongo80
9Grant Fuhr10+1
10Andrei Vasilevskiy23+13
11Ed Belfour5-6
12Billy Smith120
13Carey Price11-2
14Marc-Andre Fleury24+10
 

Amazinmets73

Registered User
Dec 1, 2015
1,014
483
Well....Orr didn't play through his decline as his body was just flat done so no duh his /82 is higher
Yes, obviously. I have absolutely no problem with Gretzky being number one. My point of contention is to state there's no argument for other players is unfair.
 

ResilientBeast

Proud Member of the TTSAOA
Jul 1, 2012
13,903
3,558
Edmonton
Yes, obviously. I have absolutely no problem with Gretzky being number one. My point of contention is to complain there's no argument for other players is unfair.

I don't think unfair is really the right word. Based on their own BS metrics Lemieux and Orr compare favorably.
 

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
7,737
7,516
Regina, Saskatchewan
Top 25 seasons by wins/82

RankPlayerYearWins/82Games Missed
1Mario Lemieux1992-939.024
2Wayne Gretzky1983-848.56
3Bobby Orr1970-718.40
4Sidney Crosby2012-138.312
5Mario Lemieux1988-898.24
6Bobby Orr1975-768.070
7Mario Lemieux1995-967.912
8Wayne Gretzky1981-827.80
8Wayne Gretzky1984-857.80
8Pavel Bure1998-997.871
11Sidney Crosby2011-127.660
11Bobby Orr1974-757.60
13Phil Esposito1970-717.50
13Bobby Orr1971-727.52
15Bobby Orr1973-747.44
16Bobby Orr1969-707.20
16Paul Kariya1997-987.260
18Wayne Gretzky1982-837.10
19Mario Lemieux2000-017.039
19Wayne Gretzky1986-877.01
19Auston Matthews2021-227.09
22Phil Esposito1971-726.92
22Phil Esposito1973-746.90
22Bobby Orr1972-736.915
25Jean Ratelle1971-726.815
25Alex Ovechkin2009-106.810
 

Amazinmets73

Registered User
Dec 1, 2015
1,014
483
I don't think unfair is really the right word. Based on their own BS metrics Lemieux and Orr compare favorably.
Exactly. Based on their own metrics (and other metrics I've found) Lemieux and Orr compare favorably, so how can they justify their position that Gretzky being #1 is undebateable?

Top 25 seasons by wins/82

RankPlayerYearWins/82Games Missed
1Mario Lemieux1992-939.024
2Wayne Gretzky1983-848.56
3Bobby Orr1970-718.40
4Sidney Crosby2012-138.312
5Mario Lemieux1988-898.24
6Bobby Orr1975-768.070
7Mario Lemieux1995-967.912
8Wayne Gretzky1981-827.80
8Wayne Gretzky1984-857.80
8Pavel Bure1998-997.871
11Sidney Crosby2011-127.660
11Bobby Orr1974-757.60
13Phil Esposito1970-717.50
13Bobby Orr1971-727.52
15Bobby Orr1973-747.44
16Bobby Orr1969-707.20
16Paul Kariya1997-987.260
18Wayne Gretzky1982-837.10
19Mario Lemieux2000-017.039
19Wayne Gretzky1986-877.01
19Auston Matthews2021-227.09
22Phil Esposito1971-726.92
22Phil Esposito1973-746.90
22Bobby Orr1972-736.915
25Jean Ratelle1971-726.815
25Alex Ovechkin2009-106.810
Orr's 70/71 season is clearly the best.
 

Amazinmets73

Registered User
Dec 1, 2015
1,014
483
I don't think unfair is really the right word. Based on their own BS metrics Lemieux and Orr compare favorably.
Here's another "BS metric" that evaluates Orr's 70/71 season as the best in hockey history, and displays he peaked higher than Gretzky:




You can disregard the metrics if you like, but if they're all reaching the same conclusion...
 

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
7,737
7,516
Regina, Saskatchewan
Here's another "BS metric" that evaluates Orr's 70/71 season as the best in hockey history, and displays he peaked higher than Gretzky:
...
Point Shares is widely widely criticized here. Like it's somehow even worse than the HR adjusted stats.

That Orr peaked at the same level (or higher) than Gretzky isn't exactly controversial here. It's that Orr was done at 28, while Gretzky played until 38.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Czechia vs Switzerland
    Gold Medal Czechia vs Switzerland
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $4,850.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Empoli vs AS Roma
    Empoli vs AS Roma
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $45.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Frosinone vs Udinese
    Frosinone vs Udinese
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $80.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Hellas Verona vs Inter Milan
    Hellas Verona vs Inter Milan
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $235.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Lazio vs Sassuolo
    Lazio vs Sassuolo
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $380.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad