My thoughts on the regular season:
Robson: I was scared of my own division before the first pick was made because of the quality of the opposing GMs and the distribution of picks (3 of the top 4 and 4 of the top 10), which ended up stacking 1st lines out west with the likes of Gretzky, Howe, Lemieux and Richard. Interesting that the teams without high picks ended up finishing 1st, 2nd and 4th in the division, as I have always considered a top-10 (and especially top-4) pick a real advantage. Perhaps not as big as I thought. I don't have the old drafts in front of me and my memory is not perfect, but I can't recall a stronger division in the three drafts that I've been a part of.
Hewitt: The hardest division for me to rank, as I like all of the teams for different reasons and I think the Hewitt has the most parity from 1-7. A division largely defined by its #1 defensemen. I will pay very close attention to the playoff threads in this division because small movements in player value (ie. new information) or just particular matchups could go a long way to determining the winners. I'm still very interested in seeing more in-depth (as in: season-by-season) analysis of the careers of Lalonde and Taylor.
Cole: Another very difficult division for me to rate. A lot of teams in the Cole I consider somewhat unbalanced: a great strength here, a weakness there. It will make for some very interesting matchups, and depending on how the matchups break down, perhaps some unexpected results. This division features the strongest teams thematically: Eagle's reunited lines, Spit's flying Wings, pappy's Maple Leafs (sorry...couldn't resist). The Cole is in some ways the most interesting division to me because it is such a conflict of contrasting philosophies. May the best mad scientist win.
Lecavalier: A very tough, physical division full of blood, guts and backchecking. The center of the ice will look like a cage fight in this division. Trottier vs. Stewart? Yes, please. Starshinov vs. Kennedy? Uh-huh. Sanderson vs. Sullivan? Certainly. Carbonneau vs. anybody? Why not? Much as it is with chess, he who controls the center of the board will likely prevail in this division. I normally prefer the first row of the second deck for my live hockey, but in this division, I would want to be right against the glass. Terrific 3rd lines in the Lecavalier, as well. Just old-time hockey all around.