Claude The Fraud
Registered User
The Kamloops Blazers are proud to select, from Hamilton, Ontario, five times Vezina trophy winner and the only player to won the Conn Smythe before the Calder, Ken Dryden.
Last edited:
Sawchuk and Clapper are the only guys who would have given me pause from drafting Sid Abel, C/LW.
Sawchuk and Clapper are the only guys who would have given me pause from drafting Sid Abel, C/LW.
Drew Doughty D
Most consecutive seasons as a Norris finalist:
Bobby Orr: 9 (1967-1975)
Ray Bourque: 7 (1990-1996)
Pierre Pilote: 6 (1962-1967)
Nicklas Lidstrom: 6 (1998-2003)
Doug Harvey: 5 (1954-1958)
Brad Park: 5 (1970-1974)
Denis Potvin: 5 (1975-1979)
Larry Robinson: 5 (1977-1981)
Victor Hedman: 5 (2017-2021)
Red Kelly: 4 (1954*-1957) *first season of the award
Ray Bourque: 4 (1982-1985)
Nicklas Lidstrom 4: (2006-2009)
Yes, Bourque and Lidstrom had streaks of 4+ seasons twice.
I'll pick Victor Hedman.
I can see only two reasons why you'd pick him over Hedman:
1) Better partner for Coffey?
2) You wanted to play the anti-homer and see where Hedman would go if you didn't take him? (I've done this one before)
(I don't think it's clearcut which one of them is better as of now).
I think Doughty is a better partner for Coffey, didn't Coffey primarily play the left side?
In terms of comparing the two, it feels like they're about even in peak and playoffs, but I would give a slight edge to Doughty for longevity, he started a season earlier than Hedman, was his team's #1 as a Rookie, and a Norris Finalist as a sophomore. Just feels like he has been one of the best Dmen in the league for longer than Hedman, although I wonder if it took Hedman longer to get recognized because he was not on a high profile team.
Hedman is certainly better right now, so if you're projecting (which we aren't), it's likely Hedman closes that gap.
Didn't Doughty kind of fall off a cliff when LA started to get bad? If so, while he gains longevity at the front end of their careers, I feel he has started to lose it on the back end. At least longevity as a top player.
Oh yes, I agree that Doughty is a better partner for Coffey than Hedman would have been. RD, plus less of a puck handler.
Yeah, what you hear is Doughty seems to not care at times, particularly when his team is not playing well. He should get dinged for that, but it also feels like if he were on a contender he’d be one of the best Dmen in the league. Maybe I’m not punishing him enough, after all a truly great player would put his team on his shoulders right?
Edit: I would not be surprised if he plays very well for Team Canada
Better partner and a bit of trying not to be a homer for once.I can see only two reasons why you'd pick him over Hedman:
1) Better partner for Coffey?
2) You wanted to play the anti-homer and see where Hedman would go if you didn't take him? (I've done this one before)
(I don't think it's clearcut which one of them is better as of now).
Didn't Doughty kind of fall off a cliff when LA started to get bad? If so, while he gains longevity at the front end of their careers, I feel he has started to lose it on the back end. At least longevity as a top player.
Oh yes, I agree that Doughty is a better partner for Coffey than Hedman would have been. RD, plus less of a puck handler.
Doughty is a player that turns it on and off depending on the game. Playing for a team he knows won't make the play-offs is less than ideal. Even so, the other NHL players think he's still elite.
Montreal Gazette said:Tall, rugged and a great stickhandler, he was also a potent defensive unit. He had a fine poke-check,... Malone swept through the opposition with long, swinging strides.