BraveCanadian
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2010
- 14,830
- 3,777
Seriously man? From atd gm to another? Come on.
This is the atd. We research, analyze, and then present our research and analysis. Sorry for doing exactly that, and sorry that the results didn't agree with your theory.
I actually meant that to just be some ribbing, I'm sorry I didn't add on some smiley to make that more obvious.
However, it hasn't done anything to debunk my "theory".
If anything caveats like the Dead Wings possibly having an easier time scoring than the highest scoring dynasty in the history of the game have me questioning how relative team strength should be accounted for in all these adjustments people are routinely doing.
I know you aren't a fan of that but..
I've addressed your concerns as presented to the best of my abilities - have an open mind and don't try to move the goalposts on me after the fact.
I'm not moving the goalposts, you're just equating playoff performance with scoring. I'm talking about playoff performance including scoring.
I saw them both at their best (I believe you may have too) and I'll still say that at their best they are pretty comparable playoff performers. I'd feel very comfortable having either one on my team I know that.
I know you put a lot of stock into the numbers and put a lot of effort here into trying to estimate their totals, but there are so many variables that aren't even captured in the raw data it is hopeless to adjust and average and then stake a definitive claim either way. (in my opinion)
If we take them at face value and we're saying Messier was estimated to be scoring at 1.07PPG with your normalization and Yzerman was at 1PPG then I'd say since the majority of Yzerman's playoff games came after he was a defensive stalwart that their playoff performance was fairly close, no?