Speculation: Armchair GM Thread: Long long journey through the darkness, where is our goalie?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ace Rimmer

Stoke me a clipper.
Because being bothered to show up to Senators games is a real, actual, significant bother given where the arena is. It's tough to condemn the fans for not going to Kanata to watch the games.

And no, the Senators were not really spending a ton of money. They've been a budget team for as long as I can remember. The problem is when they do spend, it's not smart.
Yeah, no kidding. It'd be like if the Flames put their arena in Balzac or Langdon, and being surprised that selling tickets was difficult.

I can't defend not selling out all of their conference finals games. That's simply ridiculous, and that's on the fans IMO.
 

SKRusty

Napalm
Jan 20, 2016
2,611
1,062
I think people crap on Melnyk too much, Hes absolutely right. The senators were spending a ton of money on their players and on ice product, and people can’t even be bothered to show up to the conference finals. Now he shouldn’t have gone public and said anything, but a new owner isn’t going to make fans show up to games. Owning a sports team does not mean you should be forced to bleed millions.

This is in part Melnyk's doing.

First the Kanata rink is like putting the Saddledome in Balzac... Melnyk is the owner and should have pushed long ago for a better rink location. He has only had since 2003 to try and get the team out of one of the worst arena locations in the league. The only one that maybe worse is Glendale in Arizona.

Melnyk is the one who hired Bryan Murray and Dorion. So in essence he gave them the green light to sign some outrageous contracts.

So yes it is Melnyk's doing and he should not expect the fans to make up for his short comings as an owner.
 

The Gnome

Registered User
May 17, 2010
4,678
740
Calgary
Honestly, having been there, that rink location is horrendous and likely one of the larger problems. Pretty sure if I lived in Ottawa, I'd rarely venture to see a game...and I'm a Sens fan.
 

Bjornar Moxnes

Stem Rødt og Felix Unger Sörum
Oct 16, 2016
11,515
3,992
Troms og Finnmark
This is in part Melnyk's doing.

First the Kanata rink is like putting the Saddledome in Balzac... Melnyk is the owner and should have pushed long ago for a better rink location. He has only had since 2003 to try and get the team out of one of the worst arena locations in the league. The only one that maybe worse is Glendale in Arizona.

Melnyk is the one who hired Bryan Murray and Dorion. So in essence he gave them the green light to sign some outrageous contracts.

So yes it is Melnyk's doing and he should not expect the fans to make up for his short comings as an owner.

Murray was a great GM and managed to give the Sens one of the best prospect pools earlier this decade. He had a calder cup winning Bingo Sens that eventually added prospects like Silfverberg, Stone, Zibanejad, etc. to the mix.
 

SKRusty

Napalm
Jan 20, 2016
2,611
1,062
Murray was a great GM and managed to give the Sens one of the best prospect pools earlier this decade. He had a calder cup winning Bingo Sens that eventually added prospects like Silfverberg, Stone, Zibanejad, etc. to the mix.

Bryan was amazing at spotting, developing and acquiring young talent. He did sign and trade for some bad contracts though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DominikBokkFan

MDCSL

Registered User
Jun 9, 2016
998
576
Edmonton, AB
I could be mistaken, but did the sens not have that arena before he was owner? So yes, they need a new arena desperately but when you factor in the contract already in place for the kanata arena and the Ottawa taxpayers willingness to pay for a new arena a large portion of that issue is out of his control.

And yes Ottawa spent some dumb money on dumb contracts, but it’s still real dollars out of his pocket.
 

Lunatik

Registered User
Oct 12, 2012
56,255
8,385
I could be mistaken, but did the sens not have that arena before he was owner? So yes, they need a new arena desperately but when you factor in the contract already in place for the kanata arena and the Ottawa taxpayers willingness to pay for a new arena a large portion of that issue is out of his control.

And yes Ottawa spent some dumb money on dumb contracts, but it’s still real dollars out of his pocket.
Even with the bad contracts it's not like the Sens spent to the Cap. Melnyk has been cheap for a long time, he's just stepped his game up even more.
 

MDCSL

Registered User
Jun 9, 2016
998
576
Edmonton, AB
Even with the bad contracts it's not like the Sens spent to the Cap. Melnyk has been cheap for a long time, he's just stepped his game up even more.

I believe they spent 68 mil on salaries last year; 73 so far for this year it may not be cap max but it is far from the floor
 

Mobiandi

Registered User
Jan 17, 2015
21,098
17,566
Someone on reddit with supposed credibility has said that Treliving is in the market for a goalie and that Saros is a target

 

MonyontheMoney

Registered User
Apr 5, 2015
4,429
520
I don’t see it as a move for a starter this year. Probably more along the lines of a young backup who can take over for Smith next year, if anything.

But I do like Saros.
 

Tkachuk Norris

Registered User
Jun 22, 2012
15,682
6,819
Saros will be a 1b guy. Guys that small just aren’t starters in this league.

Trading assets for him makes no sense.
 

Baxterman

Registered User
Aug 27, 2017
6,939
1,499
I can’t see why Nashville would move him unless it is a big over pay and we certainly can’t afford to over pay for him, we might not even be able to give up even a fair price for him
 

Volica

Papa Shango
May 15, 2012
21,456
11,121
f***. This team eats so much shit on this board.
I'd love to have a big season, like right out of the gate; really shut some people up. Essentially almost everything that could have gone wrong last year, did, and we still managed 84 points.

We do really need a 1B, IMO. I know Saros' name was bouncing around; who are some of the other potentially available guys who could push Mike Smith and give the AHL guys someone to chase?
 

super6646

Registered User
Apr 16, 2018
17,914
15,777
Calgary
****. This team eats so much **** on this board.
I'd love to have a big season, like right out of the gate; really shut some people up. Essentially almost everything that could have gone wrong last year, did, and we still managed 84 points.

We do really need a 1B, IMO. I know Saros' name was bouncing around; who are some of the other potentially available guys who could push Mike Smith and give the AHL guys someone to chase?

Yeah, but you could argue that the flames first half went perfect with vezina caliber goalie and the hottest top line in the league. In the end, 84 points seem about right for last years team.
 

Anglesmith

Setting up the play?
Sep 17, 2012
46,483
14,802
Victoria
Yeah, but you could argue that the flames first half went perfect with vezina caliber goalie and the hottest top line in the league. In the end, 84 points seem about right for last years team.
I don't think at any point the Flames' season was going perfectly. Smith and our first line were great out of the gate, but our organization and ability to prevent high-quality chances was nightmarish from start to finish during the season, and there was no point where we had consistent depth scoring or a dangerous powerplay.

Even the year before there was the second half of the season where for weeks on end, the Flames played a brand of hockey where they always looked like they had things under control. I don't think that really happened for more than a game at a time last season.

I think going into a new season you try to balance out bad things that could improve vs. good things that could get worse. I don't think Gaudreau or Monahan are due to get worse, really, and there's no reason to believe Smith will suddenly nose-dive either. But all of those big issues from last year are fixable.
 

Volica

Papa Shango
May 15, 2012
21,456
11,121
Yeah, but you could argue that the flames first half went perfect with vezina caliber goalie and the hottest top line in the league. In the end, 84 points seem about right for last years team.

Good goaltending, and one line was as good as it got last season.
 

super6646

Registered User
Apr 16, 2018
17,914
15,777
Calgary
I don't think at any point the Flames' season was going perfectly. Smith and our first line were great out of the gate, but our organization and ability to prevent high-quality chances was nightmarish from start to finish during the season, and there was no point where we had consistent depth scoring or a dangerous powerplay.

Even the year before there was the second half of the season where for weeks on end, the Flames played a brand of hockey where they always looked like they had things under control. I don't think that really happened for more than a game at a time last season.

So they weren't capable, thats different than not going perfectly. Our depth was pretty awful, and I believe Smith's injury was entirely due to being overplayed for his age. I think coaching was pretty bad, but that forward group wasn't playoff caliber.
 

Anglesmith

Setting up the play?
Sep 17, 2012
46,483
14,802
Victoria
So they weren't capable, thats different than not going perfectly. Our depth was pretty awful, and I believe Smith's injury was entirely due to being overplayed for his age.
If they weren't capable last season, why were they capable the year before?
 

Volica

Papa Shango
May 15, 2012
21,456
11,121
So they weren't capable, thats different than not going perfectly. Our depth was pretty awful, and I believe Smith's injury was entirely due to being overplayed for his age. I think coaching was pretty bad, but that forward group wasn't playoff caliber.

Their depth was awful, and it showed.
Their PP was awful and it cost them dearly.

That defensive group should have been good enough to at least give us a shot at the playoffs.

Having a 200 point 1st line, and a deep D is enough to get you into the show.
 

super6646

Registered User
Apr 16, 2018
17,914
15,777
Calgary
If they weren't capable last season, why were they capable the year before?

Better special teams and getting hot at the right moment. They were a 500 team until that 10 game win streak, and pretty much coasted along after it as well.

The fact that losing one depth player in Versteeg likely screwed our PP is pretty telling, and shows just how poor our depth was. We had no natural top 6 right handed shots, and the ones we did have in our bottom 6 were injured (Versteeg), or useless (Brouwer, Lazar, Hathaway).
 

super6646

Registered User
Apr 16, 2018
17,914
15,777
Calgary
Their depth was awful, and it showed.
Their PP was awful and it cost them dearly.

That defensive group should have been good enough to at least give us a shot at the playoffs.

Having a 200 point 1st line, and a deep D is enough to get you into the show.

No clue how the defensive group fell apart like that, even with slightly below average goaltending. I know advanced stats say the flames had a lot of high scoring chances, but they clearly had to be bleeding chances against too. Don't know how a 0.01SV% drop leads to 25 additional goals against us, but that defense needs to be better next year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad