Only if the numbers are reasonable. More and more players know this is how it is going.
Thanks.......carry on.shekki said:He was on the Blake Price show on Mojo radio. I heard him say the same thing.
HABSoluteDMB11 said:with all these guys coming out and saying they'd accept a cap (even the ones who've retracted statements) including guys like Roenick and Peca, I seriously think it's time to FIRE Goodenow and put this thing to a vote! I've been a player supporter since day one, and I am still on their side, but there's what maybe 40 players out of 700+ that would be opposed to a cap at $42m?
dem said:Thanks for coming out now guys... but its a little late. The game is over.
Whata bunch of dolts
dem said:Thanks for coming out now guys... but its a little late. The game is over.
Whata bunch of dolts
HABSoluteDMB11 said:with all these guys coming out and saying they'd accept a cap (even the ones who've retracted statements) including guys like Roenick and Peca, I seriously think it's time to FIRE Goodenow and put this thing to a vote! I've been a player supporter since day one, and I am still on their side, but there's what maybe 40 players out of 700+ that would be opposed to a cap at $42m?
shakes said:They are talking about a hard cap ONLY.. what the NHL has proposed is a floating cap linked to revenues, which, quite possibly could have maximum salaries at 28 million or less.
Biggest Canuck Fan said:But the point is, if the players say we will accept a cap, I have no doubts the owners will negotiate one the players are happy with.
Again by the same token, i the owners cannot get off linkage they are the dolts then cause the players are making a huge concession.
Biggest Canuck Fan said:Only if the numbers are reasonable. More and more players know this is how it is going.
shakes said:They are talking about a hard cap ONLY.. what the NHL has proposed is a floating cap linked to revenues, which, quite possibly could have maximum salaries at 28 million or less.