Paul4587
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2006
- 31,163
- 13,179
All I can say is, if there are truly hockey gods, the Ducks will be in good hands.
And Vegas (and the Leafs while we are at it) from here on out will not win a cup.
All I can say is, if there are truly hockey gods, the Ducks will be in good hands.
And Vegas (and the Leafs while we are at it) from here on out will not win a cup.
How exactly did Anaheim get f'd by the league?Honestly man if I say whats on my mind will be banned again, and had a hard time getting my handle back. Yeah sure I’m also a Rangers fan but Anaheim just holds a special place in my heart, and so tired of this team getting F‘d by the league.
How exactly did Anaheim get f'd by the league?
Vegas f***ed up. It's their fault not the league which is obligated to follow it's CBA
You stated the obviousIt was one of Verbeek‘s best moves at the deadline and it was cancelled. Whatever man, let‘s leave it at that.
You stated the obvious
I asked you a question. How exactly did Anaheim get f'd by the league. The answer is: they didn't. You are blaming the league here when the league did nothing wrong
I'm not a polytheist, but I swear there are hockey gods.All I can say is, if there are truly hockey gods, the Ducks will be in good hands.
Because they thought they made a trade that would help their organization?You stated the obvious
I asked you a question. How exactly did Anaheim get f'd by the league. The answer is: they didn't. You are blaming the league here when the league did nothing wrong
Once again. The league did f*** over Anaheim. Vegas didBecause they thought they made a trade that would help their organization?
The league had no problem completing the trade when it was made until the Dadonov camp raised their handsOnce again. The league did f*** over Anaheim. Vegas did
The league was negligent by not having some kind of redundancy system in place to make sure that contract details don’t get miscommunicated and lost during the trading process. The league is easily more at fault here than any individual franchise.You stated the obvious
I asked you a question. How exactly did Anaheim get f'd by the league. The answer is: they didn't. You are blaming the league here when the league did nothing wrong
I have no problem with the idea that the league is ultimately at fault for not putting in a better system, but I think the harm to the Ducks is being oversetated. We're disappointed but not significantly harmed.
This!I agree with you on this but you never know, there could have been another deal out there that verbeek could have taken had he not tried to take this one.
What a great and important hill to die on for no reason.Once again. The league did f*** over Anaheim. Vegas did
Damages have to be provable, otherwise every trade that falls through is potentially an issue because you lost the time and resources needed to make a better trade(?).Not that it would make a difference, but the Ducks should file a grievance / protest. I think they did incur damages in this situation. If the 10 team list was known up front, the time and effort could have be spent elsewhere during the TD. Maybe another deal could have been made. I'd even make it public. Just to rattle the league's cage.
I see you're a kings fan from your post history. Let's just agree that if the kings were in this situation you'd be pissed as hell tooHow exactly did Anaheim get f'd by the league?
Vegas f***ed up. It's their fault , not the league which is obligated to follow it's CBA
One can easily make a valid case that the league most assuredly did something wrong by not having a system in place to keep proper track of NTC’s.Cool
While true and sure to change Friedman and LeBrun both made good points about it being the agents who wouldn't want this and have possibly fought against it. When they do implement such a system they're gonna have to go to serious lengths to keep it confidential.One can easily make a valid case that the league most assuredly did something wrong by not having a system in place to keep proper track of NTC’s.
They don’t necessarily need to know what teams are on it. They could just do what capgeek does and know that it exists, and have a central registry where teams know who and who does not have one, then do their due diligence.While true and sure to change Friedman and LeBrun both made good points about it being the agents who wouldn't want this and have possibly fought against it. When they do implement such a system they're gonna have to go to serious lengths to keep it confidential.
They already do, no trades are in the contracts themselves. That wasn't the issue here. They could set up some kind of verification system or something that acknowledges the lists are in and verified but it's probably not enough at this point.They don’t necessarily need to know what teams are on it. They could just do what capgeek does and know that it exists, and have a central registry where teams know who and who does not have one, then do their due diligence.
If Ottawa, didn’t tell Vegas or the league that the list had been submitted, then they don’t actually have a centralized system. Agent submits the list to the team and the existence of the list to the team, and there’s a public database run by the league of which players have an active NTC. This isn’t rocket science for them.They already do, no trades are in the contracts themselves. That wasn't the issue here. They could set up some kind of verification system or something that acknowledges the lists are in and verified but it's probably not enough at this point.
The stories in LeBrun's article today were wild. One instance some lower level employee accidentally deleted the email, in another the GM got fired shortly after the list was submitted and it got lost along the way. They've been fortunate this was the first time there was a real dispute.