Sure he could bounce back, he might not. Who knows? Players decline at different ages. I was just stating that I'd take Larsson over the Vatanen over the last 1.5 years and that length of time makes me wary to say Vatanen is going to bounce back to his very best form, even if he's in his mid 20's. Personally I do expect Vatanen to bounce back but will he reach pre contract extension levels? Again I'm not convinced he'll bounce back that highly, but who knows? Maybe Devils system will just suit him perfectly and to be honest, Vatanen doesn't need to hit pre contract levels of play to be a great addition for the Devils, if he reaches that level that's just a bonus. However I fully expect him to be much better then what he has been for Anaheim this season (which wouldn't be hard to do tbf) and a good piece on the Devils 2nd pairing assuming he can get a stable stay at home type partner next to him.Why wouldn't he? He's 26, not some declining over-the-hill 34 year old. I think our speed game fits Sami perfectly.
If this was the return... I would have rather us have bought out Bieksa, have Vegas picked up a role player like Shaw/Kerdiles/etc, and traded Vatanen for a 1st or prospects... Now it feels like losing Theodore was to only save $3.5 million from Stoners contract.
Would have rather obtained Zacha & Santini... or Galenychuk... who are younger long term players.
Ehhh he is a throw in. He does have good skill and a high motor, but I really doubt he ever puts it together. He takes way too many penalties, doesn’t play defense, and isn’t the best skater. Also got the whole diving nonsense too
I expect the Ducks send him to the AHL when they are healthy. He could chip in enough to help keep them floating until then so that is not bad all things considered.
That it is more his ceiling right now. If he can’t stay out of the box or hell stay on his skates he isn’t going to stick.
keep in. mind. we have had Perry AND Ryan on our team.....guys who skate like they have wax on their blades are fine with us!!
Only NJ fans think they won the trade. Vatanen is extremely overrated, and I'm so happy this means the leafs won't get him. Blandisi is a solid bottom sixer right now imo.
Ducks easily win the trade imo. (posting this again)
lol. Hall > Larsson, then, now and in the future.Yes and EDM easily won its trade with NJ and Hischier is a mediocre player in a bad draft. Plus I’m sure you’ve watched countless NJ games studying Rico so you know exactly the value of each player.
lol. Hall > Larsson, then, now and in the future.
Someone needs attention eh?
Heh. You're upset that I think the devils lost the trade? Grow up kid.Yes that would be you with your condescending hot take.
Heh. You're upset that I think the devils lost the trade? Grow up kid.
do you know what an opinion is? how many games have you watched vatanen play, from your home in NJ?
I think this is a good trade for both teams. Ducks fill immediate and medium term needs and NJ gets a player who was being under utilized in Anaheim should be a very good fit on their team.
People who claim Vatanen has struggled are, in my opinion, basing much of that on his lack of offensive production. He has had some struggles returning from injury, but most of the reduced production was because he had fallen behind Montour, Fowler, and Lindholm in terms of his power play time and other offensive opportunities. That is why I feel he's underutilized - on most teams he would get first team power play time (as he has in the past with the Ducks), but he hasn't been of late. Simply put, he's not as valuable on the ducks given the diminished role he had (and would have continued to have).
I think NJ will be very happy with the player they added, but so will the Ducks.
I think this is a good trade for both teams. Ducks fill immediate and medium term needs and NJ gets a player who was being under utilized in Anaheim should be a very good fit on their team.
People who claim Vatanen has struggled are, in my opinion, basing much of that on his lack of offensive production. He has had some struggles returning from injury, but most of the reduced production was because he had fallen behind Montour, Fowler, and Lindholm in terms of his power play time and other offensive opportunities. That is why I feel he's underutilized - on most teams he would get first team power play time (as he has in the past with the Ducks), but he hasn't been of late. Simply put, he's not as valuable on the ducks given the diminished role he had (and would have continued to have).
I think NJ will be very happy with the player they added, but so will the Ducks.
Only NJ fans think they won the trade. Vatanen is extremely overrated, and I'm so happy this means the leafs won't get him. Blandisi is a solid bottom sixer right now imo.
Ducks easily win the trade imo. (posting this again)
According to Sami Vatanen Fantasy Stats | RotoWire Fantasy Hockey
Vatanen last 3 seasons
2015-16 2:52 average power play time per game with 19 points in 71 games
2016-17 2:50 average power play time per game with 14 points in 71 games
2017-18 2:48 average power play time per game with 2 points in 15 games
Vatanen power play time has been so similar the problem is he hasn't been producing outside the power play the like he had from the 2015-16 and before.
Pretty much the people who are saying a team "won" this trade are fans of other teams. I don't understand the fascination of determining which team "won" a trade, maybe they both fill needs they needed to be filled?Actually, the vast majority of people seem to think this trade is even. And the ones who don't think it's even are people of all different fan bases.
Pretty much the people who are saying a team "won" this trade are fans of other teams. I don't understand the fascination of determining which team "won" a trade, maybe they both fill needs they needed to be filled?