He could. Typically 18-year olds in the AHL is a ****ing terrible idea.
It's a great idea. He's good enough to play in the A and will learn more than spending another season in the O.
It's a great idea. He's good enough to play in the A and will learn more than spending another season in the O.
I'm surprised everyone was still on the Chychrun train..
No, it's a ****ing terrible idea most of the time.
Yeah, taking him at 8 would have been a huge mistake.
Yeah, taking him at 8 would have been a huge mistake.
Agreed, if he keeps falling though I'd have interest trying to move back into the first
He isn't falling, this is where he was projected to go.
No, it's a ****ing terrible idea most of the time.
Very disappointed.
Hoping to be proven wrong.
Just went through the complete list of 18 year olds to play in the AHL.
The Good:
David Pasternak
William Nylander
Kevin Fiala
Zemgus Girgensons
Hampus Lindholm
Vinny Prospal
The Bad
Nikita Filatov
So please explain why its a bad idea? Im curious.
EDIT: here's the list http://www.quanthockey.com/ahl/en/player-age/18-year-old-ahl-players.html
I am just glad we drafted the son of a former Whaler!!! #LLTW
Girgensons had several concussions and there are questions about his offensive development. As for the rest of the "made it" list, not one of them made it through 40-games played as a rookie. Lindholm is the poster boy for it, but there are plenty of others in that very list who flamed right out.
Dome (1st rounder) was much anticipated and flopped terribly. Victor Uchevatov failed terribly (2nd rounder), Yan Golubovsky (first rounder) struggled to make the jump and didn't develop as expected. Michal Grosek never put it together despite his toolset. Evgeny Lazarev (3rd rounder) wasn't much at the AHL level and didn't turn out. Bergfors was an okay NHLer.
It's forward thinking: with the Whaler connection if he doesn't pan out he can become our coach #WhalerCoachingTree.Priorities