News Article: Aleksi Saarela bashes Carolina Hurricanes in a western Finnish newspaper

Lempo

Recovering Future Considerations Truther
Sponsor
Feb 23, 2014
26,887
83,838
Micheal Oatgiant was very good in his sheriff role.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,276
138,813
Bojangles Parking Lot
I must disagree about the "idiot owner" statement. The owner is not an idiot. The owner is The Invisible Hand of Capitalism. She's absent the whole movie, no one knows who she is or what she wants, and then at the very end, turns out that she's someone who is happy to watch the team burn so she can take a tax loss -- just like the steel mill owners are happy to watch the town burn.

Nancy O'Dowd was writing about the Chiefs/Jets, sure -- but she was also writing an elegy to Johnstown, and a whole way of life in America. Film is hella deep.

I'm thinking of the GM, then. He's pretty clearly a send-up of the old-school GMs who would end a guy's career to save a nickel and then replace him with a bouncer-on-skates just to sell a few more tickets.
 

Finlandia WOAT

js7.4x8fnmcf5070124
May 23, 2010
24,191
23,867
Seriously though, it's very obviously a criticism of how decreasingly-talented players were expected to physically beat the **** out of each other in a non-hockey bloodsport for the entertainment of idiot fans and the enrichment of idiot owners. Like, you cannot possibly watch that movie with the word "satire" in mind and not see this written all over every scene.

But bring up Slap Shot at the bar, and it's all "yeaaaahhhh the Hanson Brothers baby! Old time hockey!!!"

I interpreted it as how "The Code" of hockey in which players policed themselves, granting if it had ever existed, had since devolved into empty cliche meant to enable the transformation of the beautiful game into modern bloodsport. That's the joke about Eddie Shore- he played hard, but he played the game to win, not to beat each other senseless in senseless violence. I agree that it as a fairly genuine, if more essential than literal, representation of minor league hockey in the '70's/'80's as modern day gladiatorial fights. It's what makes it such an irony when someone brings up the movie non-satirically as if it's a defense of The Code.

But I dig the betrayal of the working class theme Hank came up with. Never saw that.
 
Last edited:

Lempo

Recovering Future Considerations Truther
Sponsor
Feb 23, 2014
26,887
83,838
So apparently after the real life Johnstown Jets folded in 1977, they were succeeded by Johnstown Chiefs in 1987 which team relocated to Greenville, SC in 2010.

We. We own the Chiefs.
 

Navin R Slavin

Fifth line center
Jan 1, 2011
16,216
63,678
Durrm NC
I interpreted it as how "The Code" of hockey in which players policed themselves, granting if it had ever existed, had since devolved into empty cliche meant to enable the transformation of the beautiful game into modern bloodsport. That's the joke about Eddie Shore- he played hard, but he played the game to win, not to beat each other senseless in senseless violence. I took it as a fairly genuine, if more essential than literal, representation of minor league hockey in the '70's/'80's as modern day gladiatorial fights. It's what makes it such an irony when someone brings up the movie non-satirically as if it's a defense of The Code.

But I dig the betrayal of the working class theme Hank came up with. Never saw that.
Your interpretation is also entirely correct.

We won't even get into the sexual politics. That's a whole 'nother movie. Three movies in one! At least!
 

Joe McGrath

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
18,173
38,291
I'm thinking of the GM, then. He's pretty clearly a send-up of the old-school GMs who would end a guy's career to save a nickel and then replace him with a bouncer-on-skates just to sell a few more tickets.

Don’t you besmirch Joe McGrath like that.

“They came here tonight...to scout the Chiefs. Not this bunch of......p***yes!”
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad