Hunter368
RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
- Nov 8, 2011
- 27,055
- 23,735
an upgrade on pionk would be nice but I doubt there is one that is available
Agreed
an upgrade on pionk would be nice but I doubt there is one that is available
This. They look damn good this year.They should do it. They're a good team. The fan base is rightly impatient. They've had poor play-off results the last few years. The core is in its prime. At some point you have to recognize its time to just go for it. West is wide open.
Maybe Lindholm is rejuvenated by a trade. Rejuvenated going to Winnipeg? Less likely.I'd rather get Barlow/McGroarty than Lambert/Lucious
Jets fans, Lindholm would be rejuvinated in WPG, and you guys would love him. Don't pretend he's just an average NHLer. He could be the piece to really put you in contention.
Winnipeg Jets Top 10 Prospects for 2023-24
Here is a detailed dive into the Top 10 Prospects in the Jets' system for 2023-24: players on the cusp of turning pro or breaking out.thehockeywriters.com
According to this article, Barlow is the Jets 5th rakned prospect. Who knows where Chevy has him ranked. But if they feel that Lindholm is what they need and they don't have to give anything from the roster up, how could they say no?
Is Anderson looking at the Horvat and PLD contracts as comparables?He’s averaged .86 ppg in 6 seasons in Calgary…. a 71 point pace which is one of the best in the NHL over that time span. Pretty decent for one of the best two way centers in the world.
You’re going to cherry pick his one bad half season and say he’s a 50 point player. Try again, bud. That’s the equivalent of saying William Nylander is a 116 point player.
Pretty sure he can play both sides, but maybe I'm wrong.
So, Chris Tanev?
Don’t want Tanev… at least I don’tProbably getting very greedy wanting both Lindholm and Tanev
But yes those are our only two needs. We have guys playing really well in those slots (Namestnikov, Pionk) whose careers suggest that they could for sure be plus contractors in the post season if they were a little lower in the lineup.
We need guys that aren't going to struggle to pick up the defensive structure and mess with the chemistry the team has going. Both Calgary guys git that description to a tee.
Will be fun to follow this saga as it plays out. Lots of teams are going to want these guys.
How has Strome been since going to Washington?
his offensive numbers look ok, but I haven’t kept up with him since he left CHI…. How’s his defensive game?
Could he be a 2C possibility
Don’t want Tanev… at least I don’t
for lindholm? my lord people don't know what rentals go for despite there being a deadline every yearOffer him 2 months early and half retention if Jets put McG and Barlow in play? Plus their first this year unprotected
Lindholm is going to be expensive and rentals are going to be more expensive than the past ~2 years where every team was in a cap crunch.for lindholm? my lord people don't know what rentals go for despite there being a deadline every year
If you want him bad enough you will?for lindholm? my lord people don't know what rentals go for despite there being a deadline every year
I swear to god I have to read every year why this year rentals are going to returns 1st + top prospects...Lindholm is going to be expensive and rentals are going to be more expensive than the past ~2 years where every team was in a cap crunch.
Lots of teams are in the playoff hunt and near the end of their current window or need results. Lindholm won't return McGroaty - but will likely cost Lucius/Chibrikov + 1st type of
And what do you think a rental of Lindholm's ilk will net as a rental at TDL?for lindholm? my lord people don't know what rentals go for despite there being a deadline every year
Considering the other contender for his services Colorado’s top prospect is Ritchie jets can make a winning bid with a prospect like Barlow/ lambert and a 1st.And what do you think a rental of Lindholm's ilk will net as a rental at TDL?
That's in the ballpark to me.Considering the other contender for his services Colorado’s top prospect is Ritchie jets can make a winning bid with a prospect like Barlow/ lambert and a 1st.
Considering the other contender for his services Colorado’s top prospect is Ritchie jets can make a winning bid with a prospect like Barlow/ lambert and a 1st.
And the top TDL target normally does return that.I swear to god I have to read every year why this year rentals are going to returns 1st + top prospects...
I love how I said rentals don't return that and you come back and tell me that non-rentals went for more...And the top TDL target normally does return that.
Meier went for a top prospect + 1st + bunch of young talent.
Chychrun went for the equivalent of a late 1st + top prospect (#12 overall + 2 2nds)
Lindholm will be the most sought after TDL target this year, he isn't going to be cheap.
Meier was a essentially a pending UFA. There's a good chance a team like Boston will extend Lindholm the moment they trade for him. If you prefer we can use H. Lindholm, Duchene, etc. as another example.I love how I said rentals don't return that and you come back and tell me that non-rentals went for more...
The prospect in the Meier trade was rated their 9th top prospect... big difference between a teams 9th rated prospect vs expecting a 1st and the teams #1 and #2 prospectAnd the top TDL target normally does return that.
Meier went for a top prospect + 1st + bunch of young talent.
Chychrun went for the equivalent of a late 1st + top prospect (#12 overall + 2 2nds)
Lindholm will be the most sought after TDL target this year, he isn't going to be cheap.
meier rfa with 1 year of control leftMeier was a essentially a pending UFA. There's a good chance a team like Boston will extend Lindholm the moment they trade for him. If you prefer we can use H. Lindholm, Duchene, etc. as another example.
You aren't competing with teams who view Lindholm as a pure rental, you also need to outbid teams that are interested in extending him.
A $10 mil QO is 1 year of control?meier rfa with 1 year of control left
duchene went for a 1st and a conditional 1st if he re-signed in cbj
lindholm went for a 1st + 2nd +2nd and former 1st round pick in his draft +6
yes, obviously he will get more if he gets traded with an extension, but notice how I kept saying RENTALS don't return a 1st + top prospects so I don't get why you keeping brining up that he could get more if he's extended when I'm talking about rental value...