MojoJojo said:Then maybe the title of the thread should be changed.
Fake Plastic Sabre said:Yeah, I mean it's not like he has Briere, Drury, Afinogenov, and Dumont to get the puck to him.
DanielBriere48 said:Yeah no experience,I mean he spent a season in the AHL and scored 42 goals,and the team he's going to was 10th in scoring last season.
PecaFan said:Number of 30 goal scorers in the group: 0
Number of 60 point guys in the group: 1
Satan, the top goal scorer: gone
Zhitnik, the top scoring defenseman: gone.
AKA, weak supporting cast.
Vanek, games played in the NHL: 0
AKA, raw rookie, who has *never* played a single game against NHL talent. Which is the freakin' definition of inexperienced.
Geezus. You make an observation, and folks jump on you as if you insulted their lineage.
PecaFan said:Number of 30 goal scorers in the group: 0
Number of 60 point guys in the group: 1
Satan, the top goal scorer: gone
Zhitnik, the top scoring defenseman: gone.
AKA, weak supporting cast.
Vanek, games played in the NHL: 0
AKA, raw rookie, who has *never* played a single game against NHL talent. Which is the freakin' definition of inexperienced.
Geezus. You make an observation, and folks jump on you as if you insulted their lineage.
SabresFan44 said:Thomas Vanek, he was 2nd in scoring in the American League
He's on the Sabres, will get lots of ice time I'd think... take him
joepeps said:Carter Richards Steen Colaiacovo Wellwood Johnson Brule Kopitar
there are tons that can make it... especially in a smaller market.....
He was 2nd in the ahl in scoring with 42 goals maybe your thinking of points.AgentNaslund said:2nd my butt. He finished 20. Way ta go overhype your own prospects.