Saying he might have to be traded is not the same as wanting him to be traded. You're smart enough to know the difference.There are multiples members who believe that he's the one that needs to get traded to make cap room.
I'm against it so I'm going to use bits of informations to show that he shouldn't be considered. No straw men there.
There are multiples members who believe that he's the one that needs to get traded to make cap room.
I'm against it so I'm going to use bits of informations to show that he shouldn't be considered. No straw men there.
Is the season over yet?
Some of you guys childish meltdowns before the season even started was absolutely hilarious. Comedy gold
Semantics. It's all about who has to get traded because we're in a cap crunch. If you believe that it has to be Lehky then I disagree.Saying he might have to be traded is not the same as wanting him to be traded. You're smart enough to know the difference.
Nope, just doing my usual job of correct you when you've gone way off course.Semantics. It's all about who has to get traded because we're in a cap crunch. If you believe that it has to be Lehky then I disagree.
Anyway, looks like you're looking for a fight and I'm in a good mood today so I'll leave that opportunity to someone else.
A 60 point guy for $3M? Last year, Rodrigues was a 40 point guy and got that salary.The solution is simple:
1- Trade Rants and Girard for futures (take no contract back) = 14.25M in savings
2- Use 7M on Landy
3- Use 3M on Mitts
4- Use 3M on Drouin long term
5- Pray that Behren can replace Girard
Now all you have left to do is fix the goalie situation.
We can offer more years and Drouin still has red flags attached to his name.A 60 point guy for $3M? Last year, Rodrigues was a 40 point guy and got that salary.
I think he's referring to MittelstadtWe can offer more years and Drouin still has red flags attached to his name.
I don't think JD will be that popular on the market, many GM's will believe that his production comes from Mack.
edit: assume referring to the additional $3m for Mitts.A 60 point guy for $3M? Last year, Rodrigues was a 40 point guy and got that salary.
Does 3 million on Mitts mean above what he’s making this year (so 5.5 AAV) or is that a 3 million AAV?The solution is simple:
1- Trade Rants and Girard for futures (take no contract back) = 14.25M in savings
2- Use 7M on Landy
3- Use 3M on Mitts
4- Use 3M on Drouin long term
5- Pray that Behren can replace Girard
Now all you have left to do is fix the goalie situation.
Faired pretty fine…. with Byram or Walker ready to step in.2nd pair LHD isn't terribly difficult to acquire before the deadline. In addition, Girard has now missed a ton of time in the playoffs and we've faired pretty fine without him. Probably got to ditch another name/not re-sign anyone. Depends what they get Mitts in at.
2 second pair LHD aren't that hard to get!!Faired pretty fine…. with Byram or Walker ready to step in.
Maybe just maybe Behrens or Gulyayev can be one of those two missing DFaired pretty fine…. with Byram or Walker ready to step in.
Above what he's doing now. We use Rantanen and Girard to pay Mitts, Landy and Drouin.Does 3 million on Mitts mean above what he’s making this year (so 5.5 AAV) or is that a 3 million AAV?
Maybe they can in time. The Avs have built their system around defense and when they have been at their best, they have 5 legit guys. Going from 5 to 3 in a year just seems wildly out of character. They went to lengths to keep 5 guys for this run.Maybe just maybe Behrens or Gulyayev can be one of those two missing D
Edit: nvm gulyayev is 2026 not 2025
I was talking about Mitts, not Drouin.We can offer more years and Drouin still has red flags attached to his name.
I don't think JD will be that popular on the market, many GM's will believe that his production comes from Mack.
Ah, I see. Thank you.edit: assume referring to the additional $3m for Mitts.
Read the thread manAbout what?
You guys pissing your pants saying we didn’t stand a chance vs Winnipeg and that Georgiev was cooked?