Catanddogguitarrr
Registered User
That debater was talking of Mason McTavish of Anaheim Ducks.That's an enticing idea on paper, until you start trying to find that specific team that has a young established player they spent time developping and would now rather turn back the clock and take a chance on a younger less proven player in hopes of getting better value.
Very specific circumstances needed for that to happen, I feel the bar was set unrealistically high with the Dach trade on year 1, people expect that kind of high impact trade each year. (Newhook was similar but not as high value).
CHI was going full scorched earth mode back then even though they'd had a recent top 3 pick with some injury history which is why they were willing to let him go. I don't see another team with an equivalent incentive and asset, do you?
3rd overall in 2021. 88 pts in 153 games played and a -38. Not that impressive. A top scout should be needed to evaluate that player, he's playing for a bottom team. But he said it's just an example, there can be other players.
That debater is among the worst of the medias and he said very stupid things in the past. His initials are NF.
I'm not agree with him cuz this year there are very interresting players available at #5 and even interresting at #10 spot.