Catanddogguitarrr
Registered User
1-2-3-4-5-6What are the Lotto Max winning numbers for tomorrow?
1-2-3-4-5-6What are the Lotto Max winning numbers for tomorrow?
The issue appears to be more how good that crop in the say 11-16 range might be and whether the Habs can secure a 2nd pick in that range.Yeah we agree Dickinson is a stud I would not be mad if he's the guy
No bad picks this year
View attachment 868070
No, not your smartphone password!1-2-3-4-5-6
I would be afraid that we draft a younger Anderson in Lidstrom. Hope this is not true.I think people says that because Basha was the playmaker on his line while Lindstrom was the finisher. He does read the game very well thought from the shift I've seen, excellent anticipation in the ozone, even if it's mostly anticipating what Basha would do.
But even if those stats says "excellent playmaker", he's not the most creative guy with the puck. When Lindstrom has the puck, it usually goes to the net/near the net.
I dont think so. If you go back to this draft and look at the comments on this board nobody wanted Tkachuck. Actually people where pushing for Zadina at number 3.Don’t understand how people conflate the reach for a CENTRE in 2018 with the need for a FORWARD in 2024. It’s not at all the same thing. Had they just said “forward no matter what” in 2018, we’d have taken Brady Tkachuk. There’s no handcuffing here, the Habs filled the pool of defencemen. So much so, they have to unload like 2 of them just this summer.
1. I wonder in the history of lotteries if 1-2-3-4-5-6 ever happened? Afterall, it's a combination like any others. Only humans see that as unprobable, numbers and mathematics don't see that. Like animals don't see art like humans do.The issue appears to be more how good that crop in the say 11-16 range might be and whether the Habs can secure a 2nd pick in that range.
No, not your smartphone password!
Which is usually the same as your wifi and banking app passwords.
That's great to hear! It's also great to have Bobrov on our payroll given his dad's intimate knowledge of St Petersburg SKA and their players.The Habs were able to get live viewings of Demidov in Russia.
That’s a very conservative estimate, especially if the Habs are picking a forward.In the best world, the #5 pick will be ready in 3 years.
It was virtually unanimous too. In fact it was pretty much "anybody but Brady Tkachuk".If you go back to this draft and look at the comments on this board nobody wanted Tkachuck.
Where did you get this info? Well, the meteoric rise started well before the playoffs and just accelerated in the playoffs. Some posters wondered about the slow start but it is really the final product that counts as long as the selecting team can be sure that the current level of play is what the player is. I think someone brought up Slaf's case where the player had a rather pedestrian first half of a season in Liiga and then took off after the Olympics.Really too bad Sennecke is hurt, was hoping we could see him back and dominate in the Memorial Cup, but Knights are too strong me thinks. Having him truly establish himself as one of the elite forwards in this draft would help me feel better about taking him. Do love the skill set, but his meteoric rise is heavily based on his epic playoffs and the concussion is putting a damper on that.
Sam Pollock: “If you do what the fans want, you’ll eventually be watching the games with them.”It was virtually unanimous too. In fact it was pretty much "anybody but Brady Tkachuk".
Seattle says no.5 overall pick VS Matty Beniers.
Who say no?
That’s a yes on my end.5 overall pick VS Matty Beniers.
Who say no?
Where did you get this info? Well, the meteoric rise started well before the playoffs and just accelerated in the playoffs. Some posters wondered about the slow start but it is really the final product that counts as long as the selecting team can be sure that the current level of play is what the player is. I think someone brought up Slaf's case where the player had a rather pedestrian first half of a season in Liiga and then took off after the Olympics.
Dickinson looks like will be a very good D in the NHL and Chicago will be stupid not to take him.Yeah we agree Dickinson is a stud I would not be mad if he's the guy
No bad picks this year
View attachment 868070
It may be 3 years before a Lindstrom is contributing in a meaningful way like many big players. That's ok though. He'd be under cost control unlike anyone the Habs would get in a trade for the #5 pick. HuGo has mentioned that they want to be contenders and stability for many years. I don't know why so many are pre-occupied with the next two years.That’s a very conservative estimate, especially if the Habs are picking a forward.
The quality of players available at such an early juncture would normally suggest a faster arrival at the NHL level. Two years or less would be my guess for someone like Lindstrom (should they be lucky to select him) who is already physically mature, for instance.
Speak for yourself. I wasted many hours debating why we should take Tkachuk and got mocked for it. But yes...most wanted Zadina. Also there were as many people wanting Adam Boqvist as Quinn Hughes...which was a very small percentage of posters on both counts.It was virtually unanimous too. In fact it was pretty much "anybody but Brady Tkachuk".
The D's potential for this draft class are just too good to ignore, that is why I'm confident a Demidov or Lindstrom will be available at 5. Habs will draft a Fwd. No doubt.It's amazing how many times Hughes has said they're not taking a LD for fans who follow this team enough to post on these boards to continually bring up drafting one with a top 5 pick.
Lol. Try entering that as a valid combo and watch it get rejected.1-2-3-4-5-6
Not sure how you got Anderson from what I wrote. Anderson has shit anticipation.I would be afraid that we draft a younger Anderson in Lidstrom. Hope this is not true.
Sam Pollock: “If you do what the fans want, you’ll eventually be watching the games with them.”