Doublechin
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2013
- 3,038
- 1,217
Let's say we get LevshunovMaiiloux absolutely, not Reinbacher.
You wouldn't trade Reinbacher one on one for Ryan Leonard?
Let's say we get LevshunovMaiiloux absolutely, not Reinbacher.
How do we know he's not the next Nolan Patrick?We need to do whatever it takes to draft Lindstrom.
We don’t.How do we know he's not the next Nolan Patrick?
Let's say we get Levshunov
You wouldn't trade Reinbacher one on one for Ryan Leonard?
Let's say we get Levshunov
You wouldn't trade Reinbacher one on one for Ryan Leonard?
Agree, but if Reinbacher is able to net you a much higher quality forward than Mailloux, then you at least have to think about itReinbacher will be a lot better then Mailloux.
Danm he's allready better and 2 years younger, you can't compare the 2 like that.
Mailloux is but not Reinbacher
That's also assuming Reinbacher's value didn't decrease at all this seasonAgree, but if Reinbacher is able to net you a much higher quality forward than Mailloux, then you at least have to think about it
But if you impose a positional criteria, how do you determine who is the best forward available.? The best defenceman available? Some teams seem to be able to successfully make that determination and remain competitive year after year. And others flounder and don't win a Cup in over thirty years.But as has been discussed here at length, “BPA” is an amorphous, not easy to define, and fluid concept.
Vanacker is going in the first round. Probably in the top 20 and certainly before Letourneau.View attachment 859085
And got AJ Spellacy.
You can see I added a lot of size and took a mystery Russian. To me anyways
No?Let's say we get Levshunov
You wouldn't trade Reinbacher one on one for Ryan Leonard?
They'd be crazy to do so, I put myself in their shoes, easy pass even if Reinbacher does become that top 4 RDLet’s be real, Washington wouldn’t accept Reinbacher for Leonard
Bullshit BPA is a real thing 4 or 5 years down the road.BPA is a fabrication. There is no such quantification. There is no measuring tape that makes it an exact science. That is the other problem with this thesis. It is a mantra that some people keep repeating, because they trust their peers who use the same language.
There's BPA at 1 and 2, after that theres no sizeable gap until ~10-13. It's usually like this in most draft, it was last year too. Top 4 was clear, I had it as clear 5.Bullshit BPA is a real thing 4 or 5 years down the road.
I agree It is very rare there is a clear cut BPA.
I would go most skilled, Catton. Address size trade routeMarner not doing any favors for Catton’s draft stock
No, but I'd take Boisvert or Hage or Alfonse FreijWould you guys take Surin with Win’s pick?
No but VGK are for Lindstrom. Hopefully HuGo are paying attention.Marner not doing any favors for Catton’s draft stock
Marner not doing any favors for Catton’s draft stock
That's an argument we'll never win.What does Marner have to do with Catton?
Catton makes a lot of plays in the middle of the ice.. Marner doesn't
Marchessault scored again last night. Catton stonks through the roof!That's an argument we'll never win.
Smaller guy = perimeter guy to most people.