2023-2024 EPL Season

Jussi

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
92,113
11,363
Mojo Dojo Casa House



Such a classy player. Shame he had so many injury woes, especially with concussions, recently. Formed one of the best CB pairings with Martinez that United have had since Rio-Vidic.
 

maclean

Registered User
Jan 4, 2014
8,615
2,737
Applying that logic, every time a club gets in trouble they can continually create new shell companies and sell off parts of the club in an endless loop and it would never trace to the main club.

Isn't that basically how Trump works?
 

KJS14

Registered User
Jun 13, 2013
3,279
1,079



Such a classy player. Shame he had so many injury woes, especially with concussions, recently. Formed one of the best CB pairings with Martinez that United have had since Rio-Vidic.

Remember when everyone said he was a cheaper (despite being on much higher wages) and better signing than Ben White? Good laugh we got out of that one.
 

bluesfan94

Registered User
Jan 7, 2008
31,277
8,393
St. Louis
1715702173593.png


Not bad, although the draws to Spurs and Chelsea sting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KJS14

KJS14

Registered User
Jun 13, 2013
3,279
1,079
This stat is dumb because it ignores Aston Villa and Newcastle who are actually in 4th and 6th place.

I imagine Arsenal still finishes highly because they are very good, but this is such dumb framing.
Yet it wasn't dumb when Liverpool were "big game monsters" in recent years...

I didn't bother to look up other teams' results, but if you added Aston Villa and Newcastle, Arsenal would be on 25 points, which would be at the very least tied for first.
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
37,369
10,873
Yet it wasn't dumb when Liverpool were "big game monsters" in recent years...

I didn't bother to look up other teams' results, but if you added Aston Villa and Newcastle, Arsenal would be on 25 points, which would be at the very least tied for first.
Saying you are unbeaten in the big six, and not including the 4th and 6th place teams is dumb. Period. That’s the point here. We can argue if the concept of there being a “big 6” (there isn’t) but you can’t argue where teams currently are in the table. Big six, I guess is based on commercialism. It’s not based on talent. It’s bad framing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spring in Fialta

KJS14

Registered User
Jun 13, 2013
3,279
1,079
Saying you are unbeaten in the big six, and not including the 4th and 6th place teams is dumb. Period. That’s the point here. We can argue if the concept of there being a “big 6” (there isn’t) but you can’t argue where teams currently are in the table. Big six, I guess is based on commercialism. It’s not based on talent. It’s bad framing.
It's a data point. One that only you seem to be reading into more than necessary. Pretty sure us Arsenal fans are more focused on the league table than the "big 6" table, but sure... go off on how dumb it is!
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
37,369
10,873
That's not what the Big 6 means, or has ever meant.
Which is why Big 6, as a concept itself, is dumb

It's a data point. One that only you seem to be reading into more than necessary. Pretty sure us Arsenal fans are more focused on the league table than the "big 6" table, but sure... go off on how dumb it is!
Arsenal fan is the one that posted this so….
 

KJS14

Registered User
Jun 13, 2013
3,279
1,079
Arsenal fan is the one that posted this so….
Yeah an Arsenal fan posted it. But if you notice, he didn't say something like "wow look, we should be winning the league easily with how much better we are than the rest of the big 6 head to head." Only you have overreacted to it.
 

Brunkmeister

Registered User
Sep 4, 2021
1,798
766
Last season we shouldn’t count teams like Newcastle since it was a down year but this year it’s suddenly fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KJS14

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
37,369
10,873
Yeah an Arsenal fan posted it. But if you notice, he didn't say something like "wow look, we should be winning the league easily with how much better we are than the rest of the big 6 head to head." Only you have overreacted to it.
I don’t think I am the one overreacting here?

I’m just saying it’s not a big six if two of the top six teams aren’t in it.

I also said Arsenal would still be in a good spot even if they were, so I am really not sure why you guys are so butt hurt

Last season we shouldn’t count teams like Newcastle since it was a down year but this year it’s suddenly fine.
No one said this

It's a table that shows Liverpool in fourth and well behind Arsenal. Of course the Liverpool fan has issues. Nothing more, nothing less.
Irrelevant and inconsequential
 

Brunkmeister

Registered User
Sep 4, 2021
1,798
766
It's a table that shows Liverpool in fourth and well behind Arsenal. Of course the Liverpool fan has issues. Nothing more, nothing less.

And guess what? Since Liverpool were in the titlerace for like 34-35 games we haven’t heard a single word about a down year. Crazy huh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: KJS14

Wee Baby Seamus

Yo, Goober, where's the meat?
Mar 15, 2011
15,358
6,316
Halifax/Toronto
If you look at how the english teams performed in Europe i would say it’s more of a down year then it was last year.
wouldn't poor performances from english teams in europe this year validate the opinion that last year was the down year

because the teams who unexpectedly qualified for europe based on last year proved to be out of their depth this year

i don't want to wade into any 'down year' discourse, i just don't think you're making the point you think you are here
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
37,369
10,873
If you look at how the english teams performed in Europe i would say it’s more of a down year then it was last year.
I think that’s fair. I think you can look at that and you can look at needing less than 90 points to win that league and make that conclusion. Don’t have anything wrong with that.

wouldn't poor performances from english teams in europe this year validate the opinion that last year was the down year

because the teams who unexpectedly qualified for europe based on last year proved to be out of their depth this year

i don't want to wade into any 'down year' discourse, i just don't think you're making the point you think you are here
way to steal the punchline :)

But yeah I mean I think while this year has been competitive, I don’t think it’s been great. I certainly don’t the the product has been great, but I think a big part of it is the two teams at the top realized there are too many games so they didn’t want to run as much
 

Brunkmeister

Registered User
Sep 4, 2021
1,798
766
I think that’s fair. I think you can look at that and you can look at needing less than 90 points to win that league and make that conclusion. Don’t have anything wrong with that.


way to steal the punchline :)

But yeah I mean I think while this year has been competitive, I don’t think it’s been great. I certainly don’t the the product has been great, but I think a big part of it is the two teams at the top realized there are too many games so they didn’t want to run as much
wouldn't poor performances from english teams in europe this year validate the opinion that last year was the down year

because the teams who unexpectedly qualified for europe based on last year proved to be out of their depth this year

i don't want to wade into any 'down year' discourse, i just don't think you're making the point you think you are here

Both points are correct, but since all the ”big teams” also failed to make an impact in Europe i’d say it was weak overall. And that could very well be the conclusion of playing too many games. The relegation teams are way worse than last season also.
 

bluesfan94

Registered User
Jan 7, 2008
31,277
8,393
St. Louis
because the teams who unexpectedly qualified for europe based on last year proved to be out of their depth this year
The question, of course, is whether those teams are bad this year or were other teams bad last year. Probably a bit of both, especially looking at the injury issues of a team like Newcastle (along with the group they were in).
 

KJS14

Registered User
Jun 13, 2013
3,279
1,079
wouldn't poor performances from english teams in europe this year validate the opinion that last year was the down year

because the teams who unexpectedly qualified for europe based on last year proved to be out of their depth this year
Not disagreeing with your entire point, but part of that is some of those teams having quality players to perform well in the league last year, but not enough depth to play twice a week in Europe.

Last year we were told that the league was bad all year, including it being a down year for City, and then City ended up winning the treble.

i don't want to wade into any 'down year' discourse, i just don't think you're making the point you think you are here
Too bad, now you're in it
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad