Hockey Duckie
Registered User
The Eakins v. Cronin debate is pointless. Eakins had 4 years and couldn’t get it done. Ducks were historically bad defensively in his final season. The jury is still out on Cronin. My position is that he should get one more year with new assistants. Agenda driven debate is boring, the past is in the rear view mirror. Game 82 gave me some hope.
Talk about agenda driven, this post is agenda driven.
- GF and GA
- Last year
- GF = 209
- GA = 338
- GD = -129
- This year
- GF = 204
- GA = 295
- GA = -91
- Last year
Record
Last year = 23-47-12 (58 pts)
This year = 27-50-5 (59 pts)
Shit all you want on Eakins, but we found someone worse in Cronin. Cronin vastly improved the defense, but has a minuscule improvement on the record.
Nowhere in my post did I ever say to get rid of Cronin. I hate when people insert shit that was never brought up. Of course, if you've been reading the Ducks forum, then you'd apparently know that I've posted often I don't see Cronin going anywhere next season. But hey, you like glossing over shit to push an agenda b/c fact often get in your way.