Yes the Center depth really worry meAgreed.
I'd say 15-25 is a more apt range.
If petry or one of suzuki/Dvorak are out for a long stretch, falling out of the top 20 seems likely.
And unless everything goes right and one of the 4 elite teams in our division falters heavily, hard to see this roster finish better than 5th, making a top 12 finish very unlikely.
Most believe our defense is a weakness. I don't think so. I think the big question mark is our center corps. Even if Suzuki and Dvorak live up to expectations our #3 & #4 are two positions of concern until proven otherwise.
Lack of puck-moving ability and creativity from the blueline and a lack of suitable centers for our winger group.
I could see them being worse than top 20
I’d love to see Poehling take a spot.
Toffoli-Suzuki-Caufield
Drouin-Dvorak-Anderson
Hoffman-Poehling-Gallagher
Lehkonen-Evans-Armia
Perrrault-Paquette
The thing I hate the most about our lineup is seeing Armia stuck on the 4th line.
He’s basically the definition of what you want on a 3rd line, stellar possession guy with some good offensive instincts.
I think he is a much better 5v5 player then Hoffman. Can he play LW so we have him play with Evans and Gallagher at 3LW? Hoffman with limited and sheltered 5v5 minutes but all the PP time you can get him.
Yeah give less minutes and opportunity to the guy scoring over 30 goals regularly for the guy that has one good game out of every 5.
In the last 2 shortened season, both players have basically the same 5v5 goal scoring rates
Both are .15 G/Gp
.77 vs .72 per 60 minutes played in favour of Hoffman.
Difference being Hoffman is a minus player, and a way worse 2 way/possession player.
Hoffman had better seasons in terms of 5v5 scoring so if he reverts to those, yes maybe. If not, the team is better with Armia playing more 5v5 minutes.
I'm not saying they can't do it. I'm simply saying the bottom two centers for me are positions of concern whereas I don't have any concern for the defence (unless of course it gets decimated by massive injuries). Savard is replacing a Weber who probably had his worst regular season play. Romanov will have one year of experience and Wideman looks like he can play in the NHL (fingers crossed). So the defence doesn't really worry me. Aside from Evans play there's a big question mark concerning his health. The kid is a magnet for head hunters and injuries. The 4th center is who? Paquette, Perrault? Poehling? I'm not saying they can't do a better job than last year's corps, I'm just saying when I look at this team the area of concern I have is at center.They’re only asking Evans to give us what KK gave us which was 30 points in an 82 game season. I think he’s capable of that. 4C offence is irrelevant if his wingers are a combination of Lehkonen/Armia/Byron/Perreault. No other team in the league has that type of talent on their 4th line.
The biggest question is will Suzuki make that next jump. And what exactly is Caufield going to be as a rookie and can he keep it up for 82 games.
I think this will be a great road team because they can roll 4 lines with confidence. Also now their PP won’t be a momentum killer.
Since 2018 Hoffman has nearly double the even strength goals as Armia, on top of 35 PP goals. If you want to talk specifically about 5v5 Hoffman, has 28 more points in that span.
It’s weird that people forget that Hoffman had 70 points in 2018-19 and was on pace to do the same the year after until the season was cut short. He’s easily the team’s best offensive LW. You don’t put that player on a 4th line.
Glass half full guy here and am pretty excited about that forward group. Toff, Gally, Hoffman are solid locks for 30, or close it. Got to
believe CC gets close. Anderson as well. Suzuki and DVO should be locks for 20. Armia on the 4th line ffs.
I understand there are so many goals to go around but this team is going to score goals. Add in defensive strength at the backend and two starting goalies and you gotta be optimistic. Add a PMD and look out
Health, and how are C's do will be crucial.
Also, Arm iui a, Drouin, and Anderson look great one night and are invisible the next. If any if them are able to take their game to another leve look, that would be big.
May need to get a better 4c than Paquette to play with the likes of Lehk, byron, army, Perreault (and/or Drouin and Anderson?).
God damn people in here just can’t present the numbers honestly.
We’re talking 5v5 lines, I specifically said in my OP « give him as much PP time as you can ». Who cares about PP points when we’re talking 5v5 line combos? Only 5v5 production and possession matters.
Armia missed a bunch of games in the last 3 seasons, and you compare the totals? Come on.
In the last 3 seasons:
Armia : .141 goal per gp, .68 per 60
Hoffman : .167 goal per GP, .79 per 60
Hoffman has 1.57 pts per 60 to Armia’s 1.30.
It’s not enough of a gap to justify the additional goals we’ll be scored on when Hoffman is on the ice, IMO. That is if Armia is ok with LW which I don’t know. .
Maybe I’m being too dramatic about Hoffman’s positional and defensive play. I’d be happy to be proven wrong there.
Hoffman, Evans, and Galagher could be an exciting line, I want to see some fun hockey not robots.
I am presenting the numbers honestly. Mike Hoffman outscores Armia at even strength. Per 60 for EV points, Hoffman is at 2.025 for his career versus Armia at 1.394.
It’s asinine to even be contemplating putting a 36 goal scorer on the 4th line instead of a 16 goal scorer because of “defence.”
Sure, the lineup isn’t perfect but when have we had this many guys that can score? Can’t be that many teams with 5/6 guys that have a legit shot at 3o.
Yeah he had 36G in 18-19, but was -24 (!). A massive outlier amongst Panthers forwards. In that particular season I’m not sure he helped the Panthers win games. Defence matters.
Also, again, they almost have the same goal scoring rate at 5v5 despite that 36 goals season in the last 3yrs. The way you present the numbers, it looks like Hoffman scores double the goals Armia does. At 5v5, what we’re talking about, he has .02 goals per GP more then Armia...or like not even 2 goals over 82GP.
Also you shouldn’t use ES numbers, which are polluted by 3v3 OT
ES is what it is. When all things are equal. It should especially be considered for this team that was awful 3 on 3. If we found someone that has positive value there, why ignore it?
Huberdeau was -14 that season. Is he not playable? Why not reference the season after when Hoffman scored at a 36 goal pace again and was only -5? Convenient I guess.
It’s silly to claim Hoffman didn’t help the Panthers win games even if he scored 36 goals. This is pointless.
Yeah he had 36G in 18-19, but was -24 (!). A massive outlier amongst Panthers forwards. In that particular season I’m not sure he helped the Panthers win games. Defence matters.
Also, again, they almost have the same goal scoring rate at 5v5 despite that 36 goals season in the last 3yrs. The way you present the numbers, it looks like Hoffman scores double the goals Armia does. At 5v5, what we’re talking about, he has .02 goals per GP more then Armia...or like not even 2 goals over 82GP.
Also you shouldn’t use ES numbers, which are polluted by 3v3 OT