nugg
NJ Hammerhead Bats!
With your mock draft we miss out on a few of my favorite sleepers. Oh how I wish we had a second rounder, or three...
What if you replace Schneider into the 18 and slide Peterka to 20?This is a gutsy and unique list, so I applaud you on that.
My one note would be with everyone who has the "we need to draft defensemen because we need defensemen" mentality. Justin Barron -- whom I like and find to be quite talented -- is not a player you draft at #20 overall.
Quite simply, Barron did not have a good 2019-20 season. Sure, part of this was due to injuries but there was no real stretch of the seasons where even the biggest Halifax Mooseheads fan could say Barron was playing even close to expectations. Barron was coming off a very good draft-minus-2 season and an excellent Hlinka-Gretzky Tourney and there were high expectations for him. But not only did Barron not show improvement from the year before, there was possibly even some regression there.
Here's what you're getting with Justin Barron. He's a terrific skater and a big kid, which is impressive, but seems to be a running theme with "universally over-ranked defensemen". He's solid defensively, but we're not talking a Braden Schneider-like shut-down force. Barron is actually not physical at all, he relies more on his inherent speed advantage than his inherent size advantage. Barron has a good shot from the point, anticipates the play well, and is very difficult to beat in one-on-one battles. But this is really what you're getting, because Barron has shown no extraordinary puck skills or passing ability. I would call him "functional" in both respects.
So, what we have in Barron is a RD who is good but not great in his own zone, functional with the puck and can give you an unremarkable, efficient game. I would say he has a high floor as a 5/6 D because of the size and speed combined with his solid defensive play. But the upside is as a mid-pairing guy and -- coming off a very tough 2019-20 -- he's a long way from that.
Yes, I would draft Justin Barron. But not at #20. I just made the same argument about a similar RD in Helge Grans, and would say the same about Barron. There is just too much talent you'd be passing up to cross your fingers that Barron or Grans develop into their ultimate upside as a #3/#4 defenseman. I'd rather wait until the 3rd or 4th round and take a RD with similar upside like Faber or Niemela or Moore or Persson or Rafkin.
With your mock draft we miss out on a few of my favorite sleepers. Oh how I wish we had a second rounder, or three...
What if you replace Schneider into the 18 and slide Peterka to 20?
i thought daniil misyul is a converted forward. he might focuses on the d aspect of the game, but hopefully will end up as a offensive capable two way d.If we don't get Drysdale at pick 7, then Helge Grans probably comes into consideration at pick 18 or 20.
I don't disagree with Cosentino. We have Ty Smith and Reilly Walsh and that's it with regards to offensive D prospects in NJ organization.
We have much better defensive D prospect depth, so I do want to get an offensive D in this draft.
But the one I really want is Drysdale.
i thought daniil misyul is a converted forward. he might focuses on the d aspect of the game, but hopefully will end up as a offensive capable two way d.
Strange... I just toyed with it late last night.That cool mock draft website doesnt work anymore
Strange... I just toyed with it late last night.
The best thing about that song is that all three of them are playing bass.
Same. Not to mention it likely torpedo's Blackwood's confidence knowing he's being replaced in 2-3 yrs minimumI gotta be honest, there isn't much the Devils could do that would really upset me with #7 overall
Taking Askarov would be one of those things.
Same. Not to mention it likely torpedo's Blackwood's confidence knowing he's being replaced in 2-3 yrs minimum
@StevenToddIves
I'm wondering about you're opinion about this impossible scenario:
So we know Laf and Byfield are going to be gone by 7. Let's say Stutzle is also gone. Now let's say with 7, 18 and 20 that everyone else is available. What three players are you taking and why?
In order :
7. Sanderson/ Drysdale (I’m split 50/50). And I’m also very close to wanting Raymond / Rossi as much as one of the two D . All 4 are all so close that I change my mind almost let hourly lol.
18. ? Way too hard to know who will be there still
Askarov if he is there (doubtful) so Perrault then.
20. Take a chance on Lapierre. With three picks in the first round , I take a risk on what could be the 2-5th best player in the draft .
If Devils take Drysdale or Sanderson at 7 , the other two picks I hope they go forwards.
If the Devils take a forward , I hope it is either Raymond or Rossi .
I do not like Perfetti or Holtz at 7 . Not saying the later 2 are not good , I just don’t think they are good enough to take over Raymond or Rossi ...
Amd if they go forward at 7 , I’d want aD at 20 - Schneider / Guhle
Ah, that's not the question. Take out the "too hard to know who will be there part." Whoever you want will be there. Literally everyone but the three I mentioned in this scenario would be available at the three picks the Devils have.
that seems like a draft people would mock in 3 years (like Boston's in 2015)Drysdale/Sanderson ( whomever is left at 7 ) Schenider at 18 after someone drugs Dubas so the Leafs f*** it up at 15, Guhle at 20. Defense fixed.....in 3-5 yrs lol.
Just look at his rankings then?
Well, yes, if you are 100% BPA. Which I am, but not everyone is. Regardless, not everyone has the same BPA list. I'm curious how you would actually draft. Would you stick to the BPA list? Do you take both D men? Do you use one of those picks on Askarov when everyone else is available?