Liminality
Registered User
- Oct 22, 2008
- 13,366
- 4,013
It's now said to be Lindgren, 1st, +. Thats a late 1st, plus a solid D prospect. Besides, JVR would retuen even more.You’d be excited for a late first?
I could see JVR going out for Fabbro+ then us going after Domi for Korshkov+
We have two 2nds. Hunter usually nails 2nd round picks too.
I’d rather deal just our 1st, than both our 2nds
Wow that is nothing for rick Nash... we might as well keep JVR
Lindgren is meh.
At least the Rangers got a very late 1st though
Wow that is nothing for rick Nash... we might as well keep JVR
Wow that is nothing for rick Nash... we might as well keep JVR
Well we knew it was a buyer's market already, so it's not surprising to me.
Not really concerned that the Bruins got Nash, it terms of a playoff matchup. Nash has 15G and 41P in 77 career playoff games. Very meh to be.
Organizational philosophy is learn to win at all levels, so it’s not too likely that there are too many moves that disrupt each team’s playoff chances.
The flip side is that you need plenty of bullets to keep the prospect cupboard full.
But if the team can achieve both goals, then it deserves a good look.
I’d think JVR for Fabbro+ is a sustainable move if it’s available. Leivo can slot in. Leafs can retain or add in a package.
Martin’s role is being replaced.
Komarov, same thing.
There’s an extra D or two on the Marlies who could garner a pick.
Would like to see a best of both worlds approach. Sure seems like JVR’s toi has been sliding to prepare for it.
Lindgren isn’t meh, probably worth a 2nd. So far it’s 1st, 2nd + we know of
Jvr would get more than Nash, he is younger by 5 years, and cheaper and better
Dreger said other gms told him if jvr were on the market he’d be number 1 forward available. Now it’s up to you what you make of that it is dreger
Thats a lot for 28pt Nash.Wow that is nothing for rick Nash... we might as well keep JVR