Yeah. Edwin was about 5 feet short, there was a couple screaming down the RF fence that were foul, but the top of the order simply hasn't performed.
This is why a 5 game series is such a crapshoot -- bats go cold at the wrong time after being the best in the league for 162 games and it doesn't matter.
Which is why I think a 5 game series is a complete joke. The better teams lose 3-game series' all the time against much worse teams during the regular season. It's the nature of baseball more than any other sport where players will go cold to a greater degree and for longer, typically, than top players of the NBA or NHL. While top NHL players, for example, may got 2 or 3 games without a point at most, typically, it's not unusual for the best MLB players to go for stretches like 2 for 28 over 5 games. That's why I think a 7, or even 9 game series is much more sensible with the very nature of the sport. This way, the better team will win more often than a short 5 game series. No guarantee, but I think it's the better way to go. A 5 game series is just way too short, and IMO really doesn't prove much regarding who is the better team; it just shows who was hotter at the time. A 7 or 9 game series doesn't completely fix the problem, but it alleviates it to a degree, IMO, which should only be seen as a good thing and something desirable if the league really cares about the best teams winning.