NotOpie
"Puck don't lie"
When the discussions around the availability of young Jeff surfaced, my hope (and I think this has been proven out) was that he was only going to be traded for a significant overpayment. To me, that's the key when you trade young, supremely skilled assets. You've got to not only address a team need with these types of transactions, you cannot open up a parallel hole in another area for the team. So I always envisioned that any trade for a player like Skinner would only be consumated if there was a clear win for the Canes.
For example, if we did make a trade for a young Top 4 blueliner with Skins going the other way, I'd hope that we got back a forward prospect or player as well. Otherwise, I'd prefer patience to find that defender. We are in a much better position on the back end than we were this time last year. We cannot say the say on the offensive side of the rink.
I'd like to see the depth of our forwards improved for the long run, but I also would like us to make some moves to help us in the short- and mid-term...not to sacrifice the future for the short-term, but to make smart asset management decisions to merely keep the team competitive now and in the future.
For example, if we did make a trade for a young Top 4 blueliner with Skins going the other way, I'd hope that we got back a forward prospect or player as well. Otherwise, I'd prefer patience to find that defender. We are in a much better position on the back end than we were this time last year. We cannot say the say on the offensive side of the rink.
I'd like to see the depth of our forwards improved for the long run, but I also would like us to make some moves to help us in the short- and mid-term...not to sacrifice the future for the short-term, but to make smart asset management decisions to merely keep the team competitive now and in the future.