It's a bad deal because they had all the leverage and failed to use it. There's no reason to pay him above the comparables in that situation. They could have very easily saved $500K on the deal by playing hardball, and nobody would really consider a $1.5M contract as an underpayment for Wilson.
Okposo to Buffalo. 7y @ $6M AAV. Suddenly the rumors they want to trade Evander Kane make more sense
I'm going to be really pissed off if one of the solid veteran LD's signs a cheap deal somewhere else.
At this point I just don't see the point of holding onto Orlov. That money could be spent on a defenseman that would be much much much more beneficial to a cup run this season than Orlov, and I don't see Orlov passing through the expansion draft unclaimed.
He may have a ton of potential but seriously what is the reasoning to hold onto him at this point??? This upcoming season is pretty much our window.
The poo pooing of Wilson on here is ridiculous.
Chimmer had the lowest hockey IQ of any player I've watched on the Caps in as long as I can remember. It was an inverse relationship with his straight line speed. Best of luck to the Ice Cheetah in Crooklyn.
Then he has another year a 2 mil to get better/earn his contract.
Honestly Eric Staal at the same price as Lars Eller seems like a better option at 3C. It's not like Staal's 35, he's 32 and still puts up decent point totals and crushes possession. Yeah he stank with NY, but over a larger sample he is still very effective.
Which is great for him but everyone says this is the 2nd year of the team's 2 year window to try to get it done in the playoffs so it doesn't do much for the team on the ice this season.
It's a bad deal because they had all the leverage and failed to use it. There's no reason to pay him above the comparables in that situation. They could have very easily saved $500K on the deal by playing hardball, and nobody would really consider a $1.5M contract as an underpayment for Wilson.
This is my problem with the deal. Would Wilson or his agent really have made a fuss if he was offered $1.5M as opposed to $2M? Probably not. Would that $500k have been useful for Washington in the short term? Absolutely.
Makes no sense to me to pay for potential when you're the only team who can sign him (barring the rarely used offer sheet). You pay for potential if you are competing with other teams for his services, or are eating up UFA years.