Fair enough, so do we look to address center depth at 15th ?
I generally prefer the BPA route but I will be slightly worried if we don't address our organizational center by either drafting a C at 15 or trading down and using at least one of the picks on a center. We failed in my opinion to adequately plan for the departure of Lidstrom and I hope we don't make the same mistake with Datsyuk and Zetterberg.
I don't know how realistic the STL swap is -- the value seems relatively close but has there been any indication that it's something STL would be open to, or is it just speculation at this point?
Since we're unlikely nowadays to find a high-octane center in the mold of Datsyuk or Zetterberg (or Yzerman or Fedorov) someone had mentioned earlier that the next best thing is to adopt a Boston model. Find a guy who is capable of playing a strong two-way game and putting up 60 points, and let Mantha and Nyquist do the rest.
If they think McCann or Fabbri at 15th is that guy, I'll put my faith in our scouting and be content with the pick.
The only other option I think would be taking BPA and using existing assets (Tatar, Pulkkinen, and/or a defenseman who doesn't fit our future plans) and trading for a young center. I think the overall cost will be higher if we pursue this method given that young centers on the upswing are valued so highly.