Monctonscout
Monctonscout
- Jan 26, 2008
- 34,935
- 1
Oh I agree about depth...and that's precisely what Bouillon should be, a depth player
But seems like his position on the depth chart is unchallenged. There's virtually nothing one of the kids can do to unseat Bouillon
That's where I disagree...the top 4 is pretty much set
But the following players
Bouillon, Murray, Tinordi, Pateryn, Beaulieu, Drewiskie and even Nygren should in theory be battling for the 5-6-7-8 spots
Yes, Tinordi still has a lot to learn and will be prone to mistakes. But can anyone tell me Bouillon doesn't make mistakes?
If the performance of Bouillon vs the other young players is virtually the same, I have trouble understanding how it makes more sense to play Bouillon.
Just my opinion...although I admit, i've NEVER been a Bouillon fan
If Tinordi looks like a full fleged NHL d-man the last few exhibitions(against NHLers) I think they'll find a way to have him on the team and in the lineup.
Bouillon does make mistakes, but if you watched last year's playoffs, Tinordi didn't play against top lines and still had a few plays that directly or indirectly led to some goals. Bouillon did not.
It makes more sense to play Bouillon because you can develop your kids instead of rushing them into a spot where they have to try and just survive, plus you need to have a mix of vets with the kids.