The higher ups won't allow Stockholm to have no teams in SHL. That's the only reason they are doing this now.
Expansion to 14 teams feels like a no-brainer. And Kvalserien is more exciting than the playoffs a lot of times, so I think it should remain in a similar form.
I must add though that it feels weird to change the rules in the middle of a season and the idea of giving AIK and Örebro wild cards is really dumb.
He's been good, very consistent, but will make an idiot mistake from time to time. He deserves more ice time. I'd say third pairing for the NHL.How is Erik Gustafsson doing with Frölunda? He has good points but I have never seen him play. I feel like he is flying under the radar as the Oilers are stacked with D prospects. Any idea of his NHL potential? Top-4 D?
If they give the bottom 2 teams of SHL wildcards I am done with Swedish hockey. That's one of the most Pejorative Slured ideas ever. If they however make it so that the top 4 teams of Kvalserien gets promoted, I am 100% for it.
I read on Twiter today that Kvalserien would remain the same this season.
I think it's good with 14 teams, the gap between the lower SHL teams and the top teams in Allsvenskan is very close. I'd say that Swedish hockey got enough talent for this.
My proposal for the future SHL:
1-6: Directly to the quarter finals
7-10: Playoff for the last two spots in the quarter finals
11: Season's over
12-13: Kvalserien
14: Relegated
And the league table would be like this
Team
Team
Team
Team
Team
Team
---------
Team
Team
Team
Team
---------
Team
---------
Team
Team
---------
Team
If we get 14 teams the relegation/promotion format will be the 14th placed team from SHL playing the 1st place team from Hockeyallsvenskan in a best of 7 series. The SHL teams won't agree to anything else.
I can't really see the benefits of a direct relegation/promotion system. There is almost too much "revolving doors" as it is today in the SHL. You should win promotion by being the better team, not by having played well in the worse league.
I disagree with all.
What you want is basically a closed SHL. The easier it is to being relegated, the easier is to get back in again.
A 7-game series between the HA winner and team 14 from SHL
will be too advantageous for the SHL team.
Currently it's meaningless to win HA since the win does not come with hardly any benefits at all compared to finishing 2nd or 3rd.
Swedish icehockey needs to be more dynamic, Swedish icehockey will not evolve by making SHL a closed workshop.
A team winning Allsvenskan have earned themselves a place in SHL,
a team finishing last in SHL no longer deserves to be in SHL.
The biggest problem with Swedish icehockey is that it's too much focus on SHL and there is too big difference between AS and SHL.
Instead of just focusing on how to "protect" the SHL teams focus on how to improve all of the three highest leagues.
That will benefit the sport as whole rather then just a few SHL teams that are afraid of being relegated and loosing their precious money.
Look at other teamsport in Sweden, the team that finish last in the highest series will be relegated while the team that wins the second highest series will be promoted.
If we get 14 teams the relegation/promotion format will be the 14th placed team from SHL playing the 1st place team from Hockeyallsvenskan in a best of 7 series. The SHL teams won't agree to anything else.
I can't really see the benefits of a direct relegation/promotion system. There is almost too much "revolving doors" as it is today in the SHL. You should win promotion by being the better team, not by having played well in the worse league.