Thing is the PP is supposed to be stacked. That's why it is called the Power Play. The more PP1 scores the less PP2 has to even see the ice.
That seems a little simplistic. I'm not convinced by the word game argument - I could do that, too. The top line is
supposed to be stacked. That's why it's called the
top line! Obviously Babcock doesn't understand basic english over there in Toronto.
The 2nd PP unit will usually see the weaker PK unit. So you could argue it's worthwhile to have a decent offensive threat on that line as well. It seems to me the very same arguments could be made for spreading out the offense on the PP as for creating an offensive top 9. So I disagree with those advocating for one, and not the other.
There's no doubt the PP was a gong show last game against the Jackets. But I'm not sure the problem was deployment. I'd want the coach to try to address some of the basic zone entry mistakes the team was making before juggling things up.
I expect we will see more of a top 9 as soon as MP gets back. The way Connor has played, he is not going back down. The problem right now is not that our bottom 6 can't score. It is that our stacked top 6 can't score. 0 goals from them in the last 2 games. Time for ESL (past time actually).
I agree with the many good posts lately that take a more long term view - that our defense is looking much more solid, and that's the most important thing after the trainwreck we witnessed to start the season. If there's one thing I'm not worried about with the Jets, it's scoring. The things I do worry about (goaltending, defense) are trending right. The lack of scoring could just be a short term fluke (we played against some great goalies), or a temporary adjustment period as the players are focusing on executing the D improvements.