Adriatic
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2004
- 6,525
- 4,099
Lolol joke of the year.Suzy and Anderson in exchange for Alexis Lafreniere!
Lolol joke of the year.Suzy and Anderson in exchange for Alexis Lafreniere!
I don't want to ruffle any feathers but what has Lafreniere done in the NHL to deserve being traded for Suzuki our only center of any worth and a #1 to boot?
Might sound crazy but I’d like to see Poehling play top 6 LW. It’s a waste having his skill set on the 4th. He is fast, big, strong on the boards and has a nose for the net. He might help make space for NS and CCIf we're going to disregard contracts and assume the veterans can be moved in deals that make sense, then the only player I'm comfortable projecting as a future core piece is Suzuki. Maybe Caufield, but I'm not so sure about that.
The way I see it, the core will be somewhat fluid in the coming years. Some veterans will be kept, because we have no one ready to fill those roles and/or they can't be moved due to contact considerations. Here is the core:
#1G: It's going to be Price until the end of his contact. It's impossible to trade him without seriously hampering yourself imo. Then, perhaps Primeau, but it's far from certain. Anyways, it's not really relevant to the rebuild, because teams don't hit a rebuild button in order to draft a goalie with a top-10 pick. They usually come from other sources.
#1D: Jeff Petry. Inadequate, but there's absolutely no one in the organisation who projects to fill that role. For this reason, and because of a lack of NHL ready RHDs, he might be here to stay. This role is the most glaring long-term need.
#2D: Joel Edmundson. Inadequate, but there might actually be players in the system to fill that role in the future, with Guhle being the frontrunner.
#1C: Nick Suzuki
#2C: Depending on how he turns out, and on Suzuki's progression, it might still be Dvorak. We'll see.
#1W: Gallagher. Even assuming that what we're seing today is just a bump on the road, it's not ideal if Gallagher is your best winger. Since we might have to keep Price's and Petry's contracts on the books, he's the most logical piece to trade, although it will have to be carefully considered due to chemistry and leadership reasons. The team has taken quite a lot of hits in this department in the recent months. As for the future, we don't really have a star winger in the system, but it's a relatively least important part of the core.
#2W: Toffoli then Caufield.
Whatever we decide as regards to Gallagher, I think Anderson absolutely needs to be traded this season or the next. He's an exclusively rush player with poor awareness and puck protection ability on the cycle. He's going to be absolutely useless once his skating ability diminishes. On a team full of risky contracts, he might just be the nail in the coffin, because he's completely redundant and would provide solid value if traded now. Even with Gallagher gone a RW depth of Toffoli/Caufield/Armia should be perfectly adequate. LW is the easiest position to fill, especially if we retain Lehkonen and perhaps even re-sign Drouin for less money to serve as a playmaking winger on Dvorak's line.
If I decided to trade Gallagher, my next season's team would look something like this:
xxx - Suzuki - Caufield
Drouin - Dvorak - Toffoli
Lehkonen - Evans - Byron
xxx - Poehling - Armia
Edmundson - Petry
Clague - Savard
Romanov - xxx
Price
Allen
Yeah. They need a super star that can lead the attack. That is the first thing they need.I think that they are all available for the right price, we have no diamonds just low grade silver, same as always.
Lolol joke of the year.
I agree with this 95%. Only I would like to keep Lekhonen. Keeping Edmondson and Petry gives us some stability on defense. Savard we're stuck with.Keep Anderson , Edmundson , Savard (nobody will want him) and Petry as vets for 1-2 seasons
Hoffman Drouin Toffoli Chariot Kulak Perreault Lekhonen Armia Gallagher and Allen all traded
Keep Price if he want to stay , that's 5 vets with Suzuki
While we wait for that player, our young’s will develop into that hahaHabs need an offensive weapon that every team focuses on and that will still scores and/or makes huge plays.
Then, Suzuki (or the equivalent) on the 2nd line would make the team dangerous, etc.
It might take a while to get a player like that, but it will be worth the wait.
I think that they are all available for the right price, we have no diamonds just low grade silver, same as always.
Is that you Mr Milbury?Suzy and Anderson in exchange for Alexis Lafreniere!
He is 20 years old. There is one thing that I have noticed though. In his last 2 years in the QMJHL, he had much more assists then goals ( goals were good too). In his 1st year in the QMJHL, he had more goals then assists.Is that you Mr Milbury?
AL is looking like he could be a Yakapov type of bust............
We got him for a 2nd and a 5th… in a trade if we get a 2nd… with all the miles Habs got out of him, it be a decent outcome.I can't see Petry being traded this year considering everything, you won't get close to his value in a trade. When Edmundson returns, trade Chairot.
Meh, some obsessive fans, butt kissing media a little Montrel pressure cooker is all he needs.Is that you Mr Milbury?
AL is looking like he could be a Yakapov type of bust............
Someone gets it!Suzuki, Norlinder, Romanov. Trade Caufield in a package for Lafreniere.
And of course we win the lottery two years in a row, so add Wright and Bedard.
Someone gets it!
...you can't win the draft two years in a row anymore
3. (Implemented starting in 2022) "No single team will be able to advance in the Draft order by reason of winning a Lottery Draw more than two (2) times in any five (5) year period." This limitation will not affect a Club’s ability to retain its presumptive Draft position in any Draft Lottery, nor would it preclude the possibility of the Club moving down in Draft Order to the extent other Clubs advance by reason of winning the Lottery Draws. For purposes of clarity, the limitation would attach to the team, not the specific pick.
You can. It's max two times within a 5 year span...you can't win the draft two years in a row anymore
You can. It's max two times within a 5 year span
There's only 2 lottery picks now.I was wondering how it really works. Is it max two times in a 5 year span on #1OA only? Or does the max two times apply to all 3 lottery picks?
There's only 2 lottery picks now.
Winning 1st or 2nd (or moving up 10 spots) counts as winning. Thus, if you win 1st a year and 2nd next year, then you can't win again within the next 3 years.
In other words, Buffalo can only win once more within the next 4 years.