Wrestlers to hours in a show?

Discussion in 'Wrestling' started by BigFatCat999, Nov 21, 2018.

  1. BigFatCat999

    BigFatCat999 I am a burner account

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Messages:
    13,415
    Likes Received:
    585
    Trophy Points:
    188
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Campbell, NY
    I'm coming to you oh sages of wrestling with a question.

    How many wrestlers do you need on a roster per hour of a show. WWE has 50 on Smackdown. (You only really see 25 it seems) What is a good number?
     
  2. M.C.G. 31

    M.C.G. 31 Damn, he brave!

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    94,172
    Likes Received:
    15,349
    Trophy Points:
    195
    Location:
    Ottawa
    I see you, Chris.
     
    Paris in Flames and ColePens like this.
  3. Kimi

    Kimi Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2004
    Messages:
    9,870
    Likes Received:
    628
    Trophy Points:
    184
    Location:
    Newcastle upon Tyne
    It completely depends on how you run the show.


    A big aspect would be how fast you are going to book. As in how quickly you are going to go from one feud to the next. WWE book on a monthly PPV cycle, so they can have a lot of turn over, thus require a large roster to keep the churn going. NXT book to Takeovers that are ~10 weeks apart, so everything is a lot slower.

    The kind of show you are going to make will also factor in. WWE main roster shows have a lot of wrestling between big stars, but if you look at old NWA stuff you see far more squash matches with random jobbers. Even if they were to book for monthly PPVs, you'd need very different roster structures. NXT falls somewhere in the middle, but closer to WWE than old NWA.

    It'll also matter on how willing you are to use outsiders in a notable roll. I could probably book a years worth of weekly one-hour TV episodes with a permanent ten to twelve man roster, but I'd need to use outside guys for multi-month runs to keep things going how I'd like (plus jobbers ofc).

    And then there is how much exposure are you willing to give. WWE have their guys out there constantly, but there's a good argument for leaving guys off of TV for a while to keep them fresher for when you need them. Less exposure will mean needing a bigger roster.


    But for Smackdown specifically, it's probably the correct size for what WWE do with it. It's probably slightly larger than you'd need for TV alone, but they need to have full house show cards three nights a week too, so they carry a little extra at the low end.
     
    BigFatCat999 likes this.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"