Monctonscout
Monctonscout
- Jan 26, 2008
- 34,935
- 1
Markov is still roughly as effective as someone like Niskanen or Gilbert, and it's guaranteed Markov signs here for 2-3 years while there's no guarantee you sign those guys (could easily be 15-20 teams chasing them with cap going up), and if you do sign them it would be on some absurd 5-7 year contract. Markov is clearly still the lowest risk, best contract option, yes he is not getting any better, but he's not BAD, and the alternatives carry huge risk, for at best a marginal performance upgrade.
I'd say Markov is more effective than Niskanen, he plays much tougher minutes while Niskanen is usually insulated by Orpik Martin and Letang.
Gilbert is a clear downgrade both sides of the puck. On most teams he's a #4.
But I agree with your main point 100%.