Why NHL size is optimal for two talented teams, here are the two best club teams in the World going at it. This would never be as exciting with the larger dimensions being so far away from the net and the defensive struggle that exists and the many other nuances of large ice Hockey.
Need we be reminded,
2010 Olympics, greatest tournament of all time.
2014 Olympics, with so many of the same players, was this tournament successful? Now let's not discuss why this was the most boring tournament in International Hockey History...
There's a reason for that.
Skilled Hockey is meant to be played on NHL or shall I say, the real surface. Game is at electrifying speeds, a pace that can never be imagined on the larger surface, the moves are much more dazzling in the sense of not actual dekes but because players actually can get to the net and generate chances instead of being on the half boards and being so far away, and physical contact, yes, physical contact matters in this sport, players have the ability to be finished by forecheckers, and the dmen have the ability to step up and absolutely destroy forwards. Angling players away and finishing them off physically can absolutely enthrall a crowd. The ability to step up on players and force them to make quick reactions is quite something. Would players have the ability to hit like this on the larger surface because of the extra space?
NHL surface = attacking, forcing pressure Hockey. You can not hold back, if you do, you will be on the losing end at all times.
Large surface = Majority of teams play a deep 1-2-2 / 1-4 and never engage in pressure defense, always staying back and not forcing the play.
Now that is not too say it can't offer exciting Hockey, it certainly can, but for money's worth if you are paying a ticket, Hockey is much more pleasurable on the eye on the NHL surface.