He's been good this year but he's always an injury risk.He's not very good though....
He's not very good though....
He's not very good though....
A 1st for a goalie just seems loke bad value. He is a rental right and even then he has been inconsistent over the years. Not sure which team would even want a goalie? Value wise I see him close to a 2nd+C prospect but maybe if a team is really looking for upgrade they pay a late 1st.Gotta love the folks who don't watch Wings games and then claim this BS.
.923 SV% behind a defense composed of Green, Cholowski, Ericsson, DeKeyser, Kronwall, Jensen, Daley. Yup, he sux.
A 1st for a goalie just seems loke bad value. He is a rental right and even then he has been inconsistent over the years. Not sure which team would even want a goalie? Value wise I see him close to a 2nd+C prospect but maybe if a team is really looking for upgrade they pay a late 1st.
A 1st for a goalie just seems loke bad value. He is a rental right and even then he has been inconsistent over the years. Not sure which team would even want a goalie? Value wise I see him close to a 2nd+C prospect but maybe if a team is really looking for upgrade they pay a late 1st.
Heard the same excuse from Buffalo fans with Miller. No ones buying high on himGotta love the folks who don't watch Wings games and then claim this BS.
.923 SV% behind a defense composed of Green, Cholowski, Ericsson, DeKeyser, Kronwall, Jensen, Daley. Yup, he sux.
While that is true its just so rare to see goalies traded as rentals let alone get a 1st. I cant think of a team which would want a goalie. The canes need a upgrade but who takes darling off their hands and they only deal for Howard if they are in a playoff spot at the deadline. Rebuilding teams wont deal a 1st for a goalie. Maybe the pens if they wanted to get a goalie to challange Murray come playoffs pay a conditional 1st, oh and maybe the flames would have interest in at the deadline since goaltending is their weakest facet.Howards had, like, two bad seasons and even then he wasn't awful. He's pretty consistently been around the league average - sometimes better, sometimes a bit worse. He's been pretty consistently solid since 2015-2016, though.
A 1st for a goalie just seems loke bad value. He is a rental right and even then he has been inconsistent over the years. Not sure which team would even want a goalie? Value wise I see him close to a 2nd+C prospect but maybe if a team is really looking for upgrade they pay a late 1st.
But the upgrade would only be for 16-18 games based on people saying it goes down on trade deadline. If they are dealing howard they shouldndo it now with more games left so he can have a greater impact on season and be able to get more value imoPlenty of teams need an upgrade in net. I think it's worth it to hold out.