Nowadays I'm surprised he doesn't go first on the shootout lineup.
I like Chris Phillips and all but his being on the #1 power play unit is Exhibit A as to why we need another defenseman on this team and quick.
We need another defenseman but there are already several preferable options to Phillips at our disposal that we are inexplicably not using.I like Chris Phillips and all but his being on the #1 power play unit is Exhibit A as to why we need another defenseman on this team and quick.
We need another defenseman but there are already several preferable options to Phillips at our disposal that we are inexplicably not using.
Well the first issue I have with these stats is that it ignores having a forward back there, when what a lot of people in this thread are arguing for is Turris or maybe Zibanejad taking over that spot.Well...
Phillips has 2:28 PP TOI/G with 7 PP points in 29GP (0.24PPP/G)
Wiercioch has 2:57 PP TOI/G with 4 PP points in 21GP (0.18PPP/G)
Corvo has 1:48 PP TOI/G with 2 PP points in 14GP (0.14PPP/G)
Methot has 1 PP point... and Cowen, Gryba and Borowiecki all have none with each having under 40s of PP TOI/G.
Seems like Phillips really is the second best option by any stat for power plays... and none of the other players really are much bigger of an option. If anything the 4 forward option should be utilized a bit more perhaps.
(Karlsson is 4:55TOI with 13P in 30GP (0.43PPP/G) as a reference)
Well the first issue I have with these stats is that it ignores having a forward back there, when what a lot of people in this thread are arguing for is Turris or maybe Zibanejad taking over that spot.
Another issue is that Phillips has played a much higher percentage of that time with the 1st powerplay unit.
A third issue is that those stats are based off a very low sample size and the greater sample size with Phillips jives with the impressions that lead to this thread, in that he he is bad-to-horrible as a PP point.