It is all about Pegula's need to 'communicate' and share his 'ideas'. He bought this team because he was a bored rich guy and wanted to get his mid life crisis kicks.
When LaFontaine and later Murray were let go, Pegula, at his PC first and foremost said he regretted that he gave up control and he said he never would again. I got chills up my spine when I heard those words.
This part of your post is why I went from a Adams basher to someone that defends him (when I feel the facts are being misconstrued).
Adams is an ok manager. He has people under him that give him ideas and he listens to them all and has the bulk of the front office and coaching staff in on team building decisions.
Because of my posts, I now have been labellled an "Adams fanboy". I've never said Adams was a very good GM. I've just said that the team could do a whole lot worse given the ownership situation.
Adams may be unable to make big moves, but that means he is unable to make big terrible moves.
I agree wholeheartidly with you when you say they need a hockey mind with experience, clout, and credibility at the very top of the organization, but right now that position is being occupied by Terry Pegula, who likely has the NHL team building skills of a Banana Slug.
Does anyone think the next GM Pegula hand picks is going to be a shrewd hockey manager that is going to make his own decisions and build a contender? I do not.
With Adams we get good drafting, no bad UFA contract decisions that will sink the organization for years, and no trading said good draft picks for short-term marginal(sometimes) upgrades.
Given the Pegula situation, I would like to see what the input from a more experienced coaching staff could do under Adams before having Terry rebuild the front office in the way he thinks is wisest. That notion scares the hell out of me.