John Price
Bet
- Sep 19, 2008
- 374,102
- 24,960
And the way I define your “we” is when referring to Lauri MarkkanenDefine "we"?
A team that went 17-65 falls to 5.
Is this really the right system? Seems like you should not fall 4 spots when you are that bad.
I'll put it to you this way...RealGM had San Antonio as the overwhelming favorite prior to the lotteryI wish I could say I'm surprised. Some franchises are just blessed
people want it used for football, then a 7-10 team gets the #1 pick and caleb williamsPretty absurd system to be honest
To be fair, Detroit would have been better had they had Cunningham at all last year.A team that went 17-65 falls to 5.
Is this really the right system? Seems like you should not fall 4 spots when you are that bad.
Unfortunately, tanking is all too prevalent in the NBA. Thus, they are trying to limit the benefit of being terrible.Pretty absurd system to be honest
David Robinson, Tim Duncan, and now Web.... Always landing a big...Spurs definitely know when to be bad at the right time.
Pop lives forever.
I don’t think they care, without LA or NY involved. Everyone else is a ‘big market’ when they need to be one.Unfortunately, tanking is all too prevalent in the NBA. Thus, they are trying to limit the benefit of being terrible.
David Robinson, Tim Duncan, and now Web.... Always landing a big...
NBA can't be thrilled. Not the ideal market. I'm sure they were hoping for Houston, given the odds.
Nba can’t really complain given the elite 8 in the PO were LAL, GS, AZ,Den, Bos, phi, ny and Mia. 7/8 are like top 10 markets.I don’t think they care, without LA or NY involved. Everyone else is a ‘big market’ when they need to be one.