G, A, +/-, PIM, PPG, PPA, PPP, SOG Martin Hanzal or Andrew Shaw? Hanzal is putting up better numbers (18 pts 25 PIM 1 PPG 4 PPA 5 PPP 47 SOG) but isn't always on the 1st PP or from what I can tell, where as Andrew Shaw (11 pts - 10 PIM 2 PPG 2 PPA 4 PPP 39 SOG) seems to be solidly on 1st PP with Toews and Kane, but Shaw's regularly on 3rd line overall. On paper Hanzal is much better but the PP factor concerns me. What would YOU do? Who will put up better numbers by seasons end?