Which equated ES, PP, and PK time, which is wrong. It's not a matter of who is ahead; it's simply important to use statistics correctly. That was my argument, and I'm not sure why it's so hard to just admit you messed up and move on.
I never said there was a huge gap; in fact, I even said the extent is debatable. It's bigger for some than for others. That doesn't change the fact that he's the oldest. At the ages we are discussing, that's relevant.
Pastrnak's recent statistics have been put up with arguably the highest linemate quality in the league, and his linemate quality is most likely of these five to decrease over the next five years, as his linemates are relatively old. He also gets a decent amount of PP time already, and while his ES time will likely increase, that doesn't have the same level of impact on raw production as PP time, as scoring is much less frequent. While less impactful towards production, he also doesn't PK, and as far as I know, is unlikely to start.
When looking at the levels of production for these five players over the past couple years, there are valid reasons to think that there is more potential for raw point growth for players other than Pastrnak. That doesn't mean that Pastrnak is a bad player or that he isn't going to improve individually.