Who was more important to european hockey: Lidström or Salming?

Börje Salming or Nick Lidström?

  • Nicklas Lidström

    Votes: 32 18.9%
  • Börje Salming

    Votes: 132 78.1%
  • Can’t decide

    Votes: 5 3.0%

  • Total voters
    169

Gabe Kupari

Registered User
Jul 11, 2013
15,269
14,860
Winter is Coming
Likely Lidstrom to today's player but Borje was probably more important to Lidstrom and players in his Era .

However guys like Anders Hedberg and Ulf Nilsson were also big to Swedish players. Salming was good but he wasn't really the first real Swedish star in the league
 

Hockeyholic

Registered User
Apr 20, 2017
16,424
10,011
Condo My Dad Bought Me
What is the point in asking who was better. Like seriously? It's obviously Lidstrom by a large margin.

More important to Swedish hockey is the real question. Probably Salming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bh53

Ivo

Registered User
Dec 29, 2008
3,023
2,912
Rotterdam, NL
I voted Salming based on thread title. But, if you really want to know who was better, then I say Lidstrom.
 

BraveCanadian

Registered User
Jun 30, 2010
14,830
3,782
Really? Salming and it isn't close.

Most people would have Lidstrom as the better player, but Salming was more important for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Puck Dogg

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
29,243
13,785
No one will argue Lidstrom was better but that wasn't the question. No need to feel insecure for Lidstrom. He'd say the same.
It was one of the question. And I agree that Lidstrom would say the same. Same as me. I've just never seen OP on the Wings boards.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
21,393
15,356
Mr B. Seasons,games,goals,assists,ppg
171 1481506377870.69

Mr L.
201 5642648781 1420.73

So who was better player?
Asking two different questions. Lidstrom was definitely the better player but Salming paved the way for future Europeans to come to the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattihp

johan f

Registered User
Jun 23, 2008
2,391
899
Sweden
Poor Thommie Bergman has been all forgotten these days. I even read articles saying Salming was first swede in NHL. Bergman was not only first regular player but also a good d-man and just as tough as Salming. We kids when playing street
hockey pretended to be him just as much Salming. Bergman paved the way more than he gets credit for.
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
22,613
10,391
Op is asking two different questions. Salming was more important but Lidstrom was better.

Pretty much this.

Poor Thommie Bergman has been all forgotten these days. I even read articles saying Salming was first swede in NHL. Bergman was not only first regular player but also a good d-man and just as tough as Salming. We kids when playing street
hockey pretended to be him just as much Salming. Bergman paved the way more than he gets credit for.

Good post and yes Bergman does seem to be a bit of a forgotten man but that being said Slaming was a class act and can get a bit under rated at times just a great player to watch.
 

rumrokh

THORBS
Mar 10, 2006
10,108
3,285
Mr B. Seasons,games,goals,assists,ppg
171 1481506377870.69

Mr L.
201 5642648781 1420.73

So who was better player?

If you aren't aware you're asking two questions, can you attempt to explain why you think you're asking one question?
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
40,736
17,097
Mulberry Street
To put Salmings significance into perspective, Salming joined the team for the 73-74 season - the Leafs roster the previous season had a single American player, the rest were Canadian. Teams at that point were still mostly all Canadian with a few American players mixed in here and there.

Poor Thommie Bergman has been all forgotten these days. I even read articles saying Salming was first swede in NHL. Bergman was not only first regular player but also a good d-man and just as tough as Salming. We kids when playing street
hockey pretended to be him just as much Salming. Bergman paved the way more than he gets credit for.

Bergman made his debut one season before Salming so while yes he was the first, Salming was right behind him.

IMO Salming gets most of the attention because he was a better player, starred for a very popular team that was a contender & was seen on TV by the rest of the country at least once a week via HNIC.
 
Last edited:

jonlin

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
5,893
5,397
Börje Salming. Even the old-time players in Finland say Börje opened the door to NHL for Europeans. Its 100% Salming.

Mr B. Seasons,games,goals,assists,ppg
171 1481506377870.69

Mr L.
201 5642648781 1420.73

So who was better player?
It`s essential to understand a question before answering it. You can start your own thread with that post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattihp

Toby91ca

Registered User
Oct 17, 2022
2,201
1,634
Likely Lidstrom to today's player but Borje was probably more important to Lidstrom and players in his Era .

However guys like Anders Hedberg and Ulf Nilsson were also big to Swedish players. Salming was good but he wasn't really the first real Swedish star in the league
He wasn't? Who was then because the rest of hockey world seems to think it was him.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad