Yep. Bad call on Hull's foot in the crease.DrMoses said:1999... Buffalo Sabres...
Yep. Bad call on Hull's foot in the crease.DrMoses said:1999... Buffalo Sabres...
Pens1566 said:Weren't the B's already behind in the game and down 3-2 in the series? If I recall correctly, they took a 2-0 lead in the series and got swept the next four.
Injektilo said:Just to play devil's advocate....
I think luck can play a pretty big role, as the cliche goes, anything can happen in a game 7.
really, you don't need any more proof than Steve Smith and the 1985-86 Oilers.
Lowetide said:The one I remember is 1971. Bruins had a tremendous team and won in 1970 and 1972. Dryden was amazing, but they still should have won that thing. Dammit.
Funny, isn't it? God knows I've seen plenty of that in the past year or so...JimEIV said:I always found it interesting how fans can focus on one indivual moment in time and forget about all the events and circumstances that lead up to the moment and follow it.
JimEIV said:I remember the game well. I remember an ENTIRE 3rd period remaining....I don't recall the exact time of the goal, but from memoery it was only like 5 minutes into the 3rd period.......I remember the highest scoring offense in history could tie not the game up with an entire period to go....I also remember Edmonton having a big Powerplay after the goal.
I always found it interesting how fans can focus on one indivual moment in time and forget about all the events and circumstances that lead up to the moment and follow it.
You see it during the couse of year at least once a week on these boards.....A fan will focus in on the 1 penalty that a ref called that led to a goal against there team and forget about the 0-5 powerplays their team had.........In my expirience things very rarely come down to one exact moment........That is why I hate the idea of shootouts in over time.
trenton1 said:No, the hit/injury was in game 3. The B's were up 2-0 in the series at the time and Neely was scoring literally every other Boston goal. After the hit derailed Neely, Mike Milbury declared war on Ulf and the Pens and the Bruins totally spun out of control and, in fact, lost those 4 in a row that you mentioned.
roshiajin said:1996 Detroit Red Wings
I mean they won 62 regular season games!!! They were a machine!!!
Hell knows what happened in the conference finals.
Pens1566 said:My mistake. But with only one guy scoring all your goals, and losing 4 straight, do you really think they were good enough to win it all? They really fell apart in those last four games.
octopi said:Draper got his face crushed in, Yzerman was injured during the series and Roy was better than Osgood, thats what.
But they made up for it the next year.
errrrrr he didnt kick the puck in the net, he kicked the puck to his stick then shot it in. and the word you just "kicked" made the play legal showing intention of him to kick the puck to his stick before he put it in the net. I think that was the ruleDJmastamind said:1999 Sabres. EVEN though I wanted Dallas to win, Hull clearly kicked the puck in the net.
1993 Penguins, I remember that game all too well, I was sure with a game 7 at home the Pens were gonna win, Still can't believe to this day that Dave Volek scores right between the legs of Barrasso. Nevermind Stevens face all over the ice that night, but that really stopped momentum in Pittsburgh's favor. They win that game, they win the cup.
tom_servo said:As for the '99 Sabres... maybe Hull's goal was BS, but even given that, they still would've had to have scored themselves in that OT, and then won Game Seven in Dallas.