Who is the Canucks #2 dman

[M2Beezy]

So here is the second part of ranking are dmen. Edler won the #1 which was not as big victory as i thought it would be. Here are the remaining guys!

Barkowski
Biega
Hamuis
Hutton
Pedan
Sbisa
Tanev
Weber

I vote Tanev.

Here is how round 1 went:

Edler 49% http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=2004739

Click to read more...

 

[Jack Tripper]

in terms of canuck d tiers, it's edler / tanev at tier 1, a healthy hamhuis at tier 2 and then everybody else at tier 4

 

[M2Beezy]

in terms of canuck d tiers, it's edler / tanev at tier 1, a healthy hamhuis at tier 2 and then everybody else at tier 4

Yeah i dont think this poll will be close. For #3 im gonna go Hutton even tho is slowing his pace down right now i think is overall better at this point

 

[Intangibos]

I think this list is very clear 1-4

Edler
Tanev
Hamhuis
Hutton

When we get to 5 it gets tougher. Weber, Bartkowski, Sbisa, Pedan and Biega. I guess Biega would move into 5 (which is sad, as much as I like him) and then number 6 is the real fight.

 

[Reverend Mayhem]

It's Edler/Tanev on any given day. So I guess our #2 dman is Tanev.

 

[coldsteel79]

Sbisa is 1-4 why do we need these polls?

 

[VanillaCoke]

Top 4 pretty obvious.

Hate these threads.

 

[Rotting Corpse*]

Don't understand why I can't vote for Edler.

 

[Rotting Corpse*]

Sbisa is 1-4 why do we need these polls?

They make for interesting reading years later.

Of course since HF has deleted everything older than 2013 I guess that's moot.

 

[Tables of Stats]

If I had things my way I'd setup the D something like:

Edler - Tanev
Hamhuis - Hutton
Pedan - Beiga
Sbisa - Bartkowski

I'd waive Weber and let him be claimed or help the PP down in Utica.

If Hamhuis is moved the pairs change to.

Edler - Tanev
Hutton - Beiga
Pedan - Sbisa
Bartkowski

 

[M2Beezy]

Top 4 pretty obvious.

Hate these threads.

Then leave

 

[M2Beezy]

Don't understand why I can't vote for Edler.

He was ranked by canucks fan are #1 so now we determine #2, and all the through to #9 which should be weber

 

[groov2]

I think this is a pretty no brainer for Tanev.

 

[VanillaCoke]

Then leave

Nine 1 or 2 page threads to discuss our own (somewhat obvious) roster player rankings, which include sarcastic votes for the worst players seems like an exercise in futility.
Maybe its just me.

 

[VanJack]

I think this is a pretty no brainer for Tanev.

It's Tanev in a landslide on performance, but not according to salary cap charts....that would be Dan the Man Hamhuis who's earning $4.5m per....a big part of the problem on the Canucks....either paying big money for what you hope guys will be (Sutter and Sbisa) or for what guys were in the past (Hamhuis, Miller and Burrows).

 

[mathonwy]

B - a - r - t - k - o - w - s - k - i

 

[Regal]

It's Tanev in a landslide on performance, but not according to salary cap charts....that would be Dan the Man Hamhuis who's earning $4.5m per....a big part of the problem on the Canucks....either paying big money for what you hope guys will be (Sutter and Sbisa) or for what guys were in the past (Hamhuis, Miller and Burrows).

There's a 0.05 million difference in their caps, largely due to Tanev being underpaid. And Hamhuis is in the final year of one of the best UFA contracts the team has ever given. His contract is not what's wrong with this team.

 

[VanJack]

There's a 0.05 million difference in their caps, largely due to Tanev being underpaid. And Hamhuis is in the final year of one of the best UFA contracts the team has ever given. His contract is not what's wrong with this team.

You answered your own question.... sure it was a good deal when Hamhuis signed his contract, but that was years ago...there's no way he's been a $4.5m a year d-man this year, and you could argue not even for most of last year.....just like Burrows is no longer a $4.5 winger ....sure they're long-serving guys who took a home-town discount to sign...but that was then and this is now....if the current contracts aren't 'performance based' then what's the point?

 

[WTG]

Ryan Stanton

 

[PG Canuck]

Tanev.

 

[Addison Rae]

Edler because Tanev is our best dman (but it's really, really close)

 

[thepoeticgoblin]

I think this list is very clear 1-4

Edler
Tanev
Hamhuis
Hutton

When we get to 5 it gets tougher. Weber, Bartkowski, Sbisa, Pedan and Biega. I guess Biega would move into 5 (which is sad, as much as I like him) and then number 6 is the real fight.

This.

 

[Baby Pettersson]

Tanev.

 

[Intangibos]

It's Tanev in a landslide on performance, but not according to salary cap charts....that would be Dan the Man Hamhuis who's earning $4.5m per....a big part of the problem on the Canucks....either paying big money for what you hope guys will be (Sutter and Sbisa) or for what guys were in the past (Hamhuis, Miller and Burrows).

is this satire

 

[Wisp]

"paying big money[...] for what guys were in the past. (Hamhuis, Miller and Burrows)"

This team only ever gave Hamhuis one contract. They got, like six great seasons on him and now his contract is done.