It was referring to Amerika's notion that it's harder to feel good about ridiculing the more well-meaning and acceptance-driven absurdity of the left. I'm pointing out that even though the ideas themselves (such as transgender pro-nouns and identity-types being taken to absurd extremes) may be well intentioned, the attitudes that they create when being argued and defended can often become just as despicable, mean-spirited, authoritarian, and toxic as outright bigotry, and plenty worthy of ridicule.
If you're saying "Sounds like you're describing the right!", I'm agreeing with that. I'm saying that there do exist some areas where the absurdity of the left is capable of competing with and matching the absurdity of the right (because ArtOfSedinery implied that there wasn't). Even though the right are significantly bigger offenders (where the more absurd notions are often the dominant mainstream ones, as evidenced by who's in office).