Who do you think is most untouchable prospect when it comes to trade?

[Ducks in a row]

Who do you think is most untouchable prospect when it comes to trade? Why did you believe so?

Click to read more...

 

[Ducks DVM]

Gibson - he's worth next to nothing in a trade and we don't know if Andersen or Khudobin are the real deal.

 

[mytduxfan*]

Given our incredibly weak group of forward prospects, I would say Ritchie. However, I'm against trading any of our top-tier prospects i.e. Ritchie, Theodore or Gibson. Everyone else is fair game, but I wouldn't move any of the new kids until we know what we're dealing with. Nattinen looks like a great pick and Larsson has top 4 potential.

 

[Ducks in a row]

Given our incredibly weak group of forward prospects, I would say Ritchie. However, I'm against trading any of our top-tier prospects i.e. Ritchie, Theodore or Gibson. Everyone else is fair game, but I wouldn't move any of the new kids until we know what we're dealing with. Nattinen looks like a great pick and Larsson has top 4 potential.

Ya I was thinking Nick Ritchie for the same thing he is our only top line potential forward and our forward prospect pool not nearly as great/deep as defenseman pool so shouldn't be traded. Also he would be a perfect fit with Getzlaf and Perry. Ya we should not trade any of our top prospects.

 

[mytduxfan*]

Ya I was thinking Nick Ritchie for the same thing he is our only top line potential forward and our forward prospect pool not nearly as great/deep as defenseman pool so shouldn't be traded. Also he would be a perfect fit with Getzlaf and Perry. Ya we should not trade any of our top prospects.

Many fans eager to win another cup would disagree, but I'm on board with BMs approach. Make the right deals, take a few low risk/high reward gambles, don't get caught up spending loads of money of UFAs and lock your kids down early and for the long-term. Basically, remain competitive. If we win the cup, fantastic! That's the ultimate aim. If we don't, we re-stock and try again next year.

 

[HanSolo]

From that list? Ritchie. But DVM is right. For now it's Gibson.

I'd rank it

Gibson
Ritchie
Theodore
Larsson
Montour
Kerdiles
Pettersson
Sorensen
Nattinen

 

[Ducks in a row]

From that list? Ritchie. But DVM is right. For now it's Gibson.

I'd rank it

Gibson
Ritchie
Theodore
Larsson
Montour
Kerdiles
Pettersson
Sorensen
Nattinen

I did put a other option so you could of used that for the Gibson vote instead of voting Ritchie. I wasn't really thinking about Gibson a lot as a prospect because he was our backup last season maybe I should of still considered him one

 

[Kalv]

Gibson. Put that ****ing out there

 

[Fighter]

Ritchie

 

[Getzmonster]

Gibson. Put that ****ing out there

We have a winner! I'm not sure a GM can make it any clearer than that. It'll be one of my all-time favorite Murray quotes, has a dash of Burkie in it.

 

[anezthes]

1. Theo, 2. Ritchie, 3. Gibson.

 

[Dr Johnny Fever]

If they both reach their ceiling I believe Ritchie will be the best. But regardless of positional needs I'm speculating that Theo will end up the better of the two.

Nothing against him, but me in the camp that isn't ready to declare Gibson the next Patrick Roy.

 

[The Midnight Burrito]

If they both reach their ceiling I believe Ritchie will be the best. But regardless of positional needs I'm speculating that Theo will end up the better of the two.

Nothing against him, but me in the camp that isn't ready to declare Gibson the next Patrick Roy.

Until we know for sure, it's Gibson. For me at least.

 

[HanSolo]

I did put a other option so you could of used that for the Gibson vote instead of voting Ritchie. I wasn't really thinking about Gibson a lot as a prospect because he was our backup last season maybe I should of still considered him one

Don't sweat it. Until he becomes a regular he's still considered a prospect.

 

[Frosted Tips]

Completely disregarded Gibson when answered Ritchie, but I think it could be close. Ritchie pretty much represents all of our top end forward potential all by himself. While Theo certainly looks promising and exciting, we are pretty well stocked on D, so to me he's not untouchable.

 

[Ducks Nation*]

Theodore is our best skating prospect

 

[Ducksforcup]

Going to have to go with Shea Theodore. Seems to have the most potential and is almost assuredly going to be an impact NHL player.

 

[Fighter]

Overall it should be Gibson, but outside of Ritchie we don't have anybody else playing forward with such a high ceiling. That's why I said Ritchie.

 

[Duck Off]

Ritchie
Gibson
Theodore
The rest

 

[Terry Yake]

gibson
ritchie
theodore

 

[xxreact9]

This is sort of a trick question. I don't get voting for Ritchie and Theodore. I'd say Pettersson and Manson by virtue of the fact they won't command very good value, but they have good potential to become solid NHL players. Ritchie and Theodore would command a high return.

 

[KaseMeOutside]

right now it's gibson because of how andersen ended the playoffs.

 

[2faded]

Didn't think about Gibson. He would be my vote. Voted Theodore though. He could have top pairing upside. Imagine the D if he comes close to that.

 

[Ducks Nation*]

Theodore is our best prospect. but the answer is Ritchie because our forward group sucks compared to d. if we moved Theodore I think I would be more upset than if we moved Ritchie though... Haha weird.

 

[Exit Dose]

Ritchie based on system depth.