I agree. Put all their names on the table and start the sale. prepare to be halfway decent after the expansion draft. stay away from the free agents and wait to hit on a pick or two in the top 10.
But does Top 10 mean top quality?
I agree. Put all their names on the table and start the sale. prepare to be halfway decent after the expansion draft. stay away from the free agents and wait to hit on a pick or two in the top 10.
That's up to the scouts. We did get both Granlund and Dumba in the top 10.But does Top 10 mean top quality?
That's up to the scouts. We did get both Granlund and Dumba in the top 10.
True! Plus Brodin, Koivu, PMB, and Gaborik in the Top 10
The more I look at it, the more they really only struck out twice -- and really only one of those didn't have a long playing career. Pouliot played over 600 games.
I still think there is a big difference between bottoming out because it happens through fate vs trying to bottom out. The Wild might be on the edge of a bottom out that simply happens because a core has run it's course and losing Dumba is a killer. Falling ass-backwards into a nice draft pick wouldn't be the worst thing for the Wild but attempting to orchestrate losing for the lottery is a terrible use of assets as there is way too high a risk of bad lottery luck.
I still think there is a big difference between bottoming out because it happens through fate vs trying to bottom out. The Wild might be on the edge of a bottom out that simply happens because a core has run it's course and losing Dumba is a killer. Falling ass-backwards into a nice draft pick wouldn't be the worst thing for the Wild but attempting to orchestrate losing for the lottery is a terrible use of assets as there is way too high a risk of bad lottery luck.
This is largely how I feel. Part of me really hopes we can keep this corps of good but not great players together while lucking our way into a single bad season and a great young player. That would be huge.
If Spurgeon isn't a first line RD, then I don't know who is. He is our best all round Dman, at this point, until Suter gets his defensive game back. Trading him is madness, unless we get a no doubt, first line forward back.If were out of it by the TDL I would probably move Staal and Spergy. Staal hopefully will fetch a later 1st+ as HF boards Threads have indicated. I've really liked Staal since he has been here 65pts year one and a 40 goal 70+pts season last year. Spergy for cap and value reasons...He has another year left on his contract which is attractive to teams who might be interested . He has probably the most value of our trade assets right now as being a very solid 2 way defender. I would in no way call him a first line RHD as some have but a very solid 2nd line and in a pinch 1st line RHD. With Spergy the question is what can we possibly add to get a great return? Depending on the cap next year and assuming Spergy and Staal are gone we are maybe in the 16-18 mil range for free agents/RFA's. Duchene could be an option for Center but...? Next year Coyle and Brodin on the Trade Block. I would say Coyle this year but if we are trading Staal we basically have no 2nd line center options the rest of this year . It would be Koivu/Coyle/Ek/Fehr for the rest of this year at the center position.
No, he isn'tIf Spurgeon isn't a first line RD, then I don't know who is. He is our best all round Dman, at this point, until Suter gets his defensive game back. Trading him is madness, unless we get a no doubt, first line forward back.
Until Parise/Suter/Koivu retire, this team will never tank.
Unlikely.Sabres fan here. Do you see a scenario where Koivu would waive his NMC for the right landing place? For example an up and coming team that has a large number of Finns on it where he could take a 2C until he retires.
Sabres fan here. Do you see a scenario where Koivu would waive his NMC for the right landing place? For example an up and coming team that has a large number of Finns on it where he could take a 2C until he retires.
Nope.Sabres fan here. Do you see a scenario where Koivu would waive his NMC for the right landing place? For example an up and coming team that has a large number of Finns on it where he could take a 2C until he retires.
I don’t think trading him is the worst idea. We’re gonna lose a good defensmen to the exaspansion draft. Mind as well get some value for spurgeon who is basically a lock to miss 10 games a year.If Spurgeon isn't a first line RD, then I don't know who is. He is our best all round Dman, at this point, until Suter gets his defensive game back. Trading him is madness, unless we get a no doubt, first line forward back.
He's got one year left on his deal. If he was ever a hurdle to changing team philosophy I think that time is long past.Minnesota needs to sit down and have a long, long discussion with Koivu in the off-season. If he wants to help this organization in the long run, he needs to waive his NMC. It wouldn't be the first time Fenton had to move the face of a franchise - they had to in Nashville when they moved David Legwand to Detroit. They got Patrick Eaves, which amounted to nothing. But they also got Calle Jarnkrok, who has been a solid complimentary player for them. They also got a 2nd round pick in 2014, which they flipped for Jack Dougherty and Anthony Richard. Doughterty was traded for Nick Baptiste. So, they got Jarnkrok, Richard and Baptiste for Legwand, who didn't figure into any of their plans. BTW Richard is considered to be one of their top prospects now.
Also by moving Koivu, I think that would force Minnesota to change philosophies and approach to the game as they would need to get a new face for the franchise and a new tempo.
Minnesota needs to sit down and have a long, long discussion with Koivu in the off-season. If he wants to help this organization in the long run, he needs to waive his NMC. It wouldn't be the first time Fenton had to move the face of a franchise - they had to in Nashville when they moved David Legwand to Detroit. They got Patrick Eaves, which amounted to nothing. But they also got Calle Jarnkrok, who has been a solid complimentary player for them. They also got a 2nd round pick in 2014, which they flipped for Jack Dougherty and Anthony Richard. Doughterty was traded for Nick Baptiste. So, they got Jarnkrok, Richard and Baptiste for Legwand, who didn't figure into any of their plans. BTW Richard is considered to be one of their top prospects now.
Also by moving Koivu, I think that would force Minnesota to change philosophies and approach to the game as they would need to get a new face for the franchise and a new tempo.
He's got one year left on his deal. If he was ever a hurdle to changing team philosophy I think that time is long past.
Koivu may retire next season anyway. Would be a much better use of time and energy to explore trading Staal at the deadline. Koivu isn't really an issue. His cap hit is only going to go down if he signs another contract.
And you think that his presence is preventing Fenton from doing otherwise?Not really; he's the captain and his style has epitomized Minnesota's style since the days of Lemaire. Great defensively, shoddy offensively, not great skating speed, great character. That's what Minnesota looks for in their players and have since DR and Lemaire ran the team.
Not really; he's the captain and his style has epitomized Minnesota's style since the days of Lemaire. Great defensively, shoddy offensively, not great skating speed, great character. That's what Minnesota looks for in their players and have since DR and Lemaire ran the team.
Koivu's trade value next year could help Minnesota. How many times have we watched good players walk for nothing?