Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
Zucker and Brodin would also have to move at the minimum. Otherwise you're looking at picks in the 10+ range and there's no point in being in that spot.
I don't think either gets us a top 10 pick.
Zucker and Brodin would also have to move at the minimum. Otherwise you're looking at picks in the 10+ range and there's no point in being in that spot.
Because you still need some NHL players.
Yeah hence why I said equivalent players.
And what's the point of that?
Because you still need some NHL players.
Right. So what's the point? Just different players for the sake of having different players?
Yeah like a re-tool is
You responded to a post describing a firesale, not a re-tool.
He said firesale, yet you don't keep over half the players in a firesale. He was describing a re-tool.
The point is, players like Brodin and Zucker shouldn't be unavailable either if you're opening up the market on Spurgeon, Staal, Nino, Coyle, etc. If they can return the value you're looking for, they're available.
And the point of the re-tool is to concede that you're not going to be competitive for 1-2 years in the hopes that after that time frame you have more effective pieces and can be more competitive than before. Thus, if you can get a prospect like Nick Suzuki for Brodin, that's something you should consider.
On the other hand, you still want a decent foundation, so if you can swing a deal like Nino for Elias Lindholm, it's also something to consider.
It's not realistic to jettison 8-10 NHL players off of an NHL roster at once. A firesale can be done in multiple stages over a number of years.
Coyle or Nino (or both) now, see what happens; Staal at the TDL, see what happens; Spurgeon at the draft, see what happens; etc...
I didn't say trade everyone by Christmas, I said that some of the players he listed as unavailable shouldn't be unavailable in the situation we're in or the scenario we're describing.
Fully within my right to say we shouldn't keep them if the right deal comes along for them.He didn't say that they were "unavailable". He just said that he'd choose to keep them around and build around them. Fully within his right.
Fully within my right to say we shouldn't keep them if the right deal comes along for them.
America, and all that, right?
I'm not talking about getting top 10 picks for those guys. I'm talking about keeping enough good players to be a mediocre team. Why would you want to do that? If you're not willing to try and make the playoffs, then you need to be as bad as possible. Picking in the 7-12 range for 3-5 years, puts you right back where you are currently. What's the point of watching 3-5 years of terrible hockey just for that?I don't think either gets us a top 10 pick.
No, it can't.It's not realistic to jettison 6-8 NHL players off of an NHL roster at once. A firesale can be done in multiple stages over a number of years.
Coyle or Nino (or both) now, see what happens; Staal at the TDL, see what happens; Spurgeon at the draft, see what happens; etc...
No, it can't.
The idea of a firesale is to become as bad as you can as quickly as you can. You don't tank for 24th placeSo what is the normal duration of what might be described as a firesale? Are we talking days, weeks or months?
The idea of a firesale is to become as bad as you can as quickly as you can. You don't tank for 24th place
most 100 point teams don't go into a firesale, but HF doesn't have a rule about making stupid polls.I'd be curious to see the last team that traded away ~6 or more top 6 and/or top 4 players in one shebang.
most 100 point teams don't go into a firesale, but HF doesn't have a rule about making stupid polls.
they're the same team they always are when Dubnyk decides to be terrible for a stretch.We were a 100 point team. I don't quite know what we are right now.
they're the same team they always are when Dubnyk decides to be terrible for a stretch.
The defense "falling apart" is directly related to Dubnyk. It's no different when dubnyk is playing great. 2-3 weeks ago everyone around here was talking about being one of the best teams in the West. When your goaltender is playing well, everyone's confidence goes up and everything comes easier. Once a team loses confidence in their goaltender, everything goes to shit.Dubnyk being terrible for a stretch doesn't have much to do with Nino and Coyle being on pace for 11 goals each, or not having a NHL quality 3rd line, or our defense falling apart.