When Frank Boucher tried to "fix" hockey

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,346
139,145
Bojangles Parking Lot
Frank Boucher is best known for being one of the superstar centers of the 1920s-30s, the pivot of the Bread Line, annual winner (and literal owner) of the Lady Byng, and a fixture in the Rangers organization for many decades.

Less remembered is his tenure at the head of the Saskatchewan Junior league in the early 1960s, where he embarked on a crusade to solve the flaws which had crept into the game.

Boucher's first salvo was fired at the slapshot, which he characterized as a 'trick shot' which was detrimental to proper stickhandling and shooting. In 1963, he issued a rule change in the SJHL which made slapping the puck a minor penalty if used beyond the opposing blue line. By all accounts, this virtually eliminated use of the slapshot in that league. Circumstantially, the evidence suggests that this was a reaction to Bobby Hull's 50-goal campaign in 1962, which triggered a surge of slapshots among young players.

News coverage of the time suggests a sharp East/West divide on the topic. The Canadian Press article written on the topic shows Boucher receiving support (or at least a lack of objection) from Manitoba junior league president Bill Robinson, Winnipeg Rangers coach George Pennell, Winnipeg Braves GM Bill Addison, and Vancouver Canucks coach Max McNab. On the other hand, it quotes Oshawa Generals coach Wren Blair and Toronto Maple Leafs coach Punch Imlach as saying the rule was anything from unnecessary to unenforceable (though Imlach granted it might help younger prospects). A later article had Jacques Plante and Emile Francis opposed to the change.

But the juiciest quotes came from Hamilton Red Wings (OHA) coach Eddie Bush:

"Frankie thinks everybody should be a Lady Byng winner like him," scoffed Bush, the vociferous coach of Hamilton Red Wings in the Ontario Hockey Association Junior A league.

He said Tuesday that if Boucher had his way, players would be penalized for having unkempt hair, would wear bow ties and shy away in embarrassment from body contact.

By 1964, it was clear that Boucher had grander designs for remaking the sport. On January 9th, he wrote an article for newspaper publication which outlined a complete plan for "altering present day rules to make the game more open and attractive to the public".

frank-boucher.png


Boucher's modest proposal to increase skillful offensive flow:

- Shrink the neutral zone by 6'
- Remove the center red line. Icing to be measured from the offensive blue line (i.e. no dumping the puck in, unless you can win a touch-icing footrace)
- Icing when shorthanded only permitted when 2 men short
- No body checking within 3' of the boards
- No pinning a player against the boards, nor freezing the puck along the boards for a face-off.
- Minor stick infractions such as tripping to be ignored unless deemed intentional
- Harsher penalties for serious/violent infractions
- "Curtailment" of the slap shot

The sum of these changes would be a game far more focused on puck handling the entire length of the ice. Without the benefit of dump-ins, players would need to organize an offensive rush across the blue line. In the event that it failed, the defense would have more space and time to organize a counter-rush in the opposite direction, rather than being hemmed in by a forecheck.

In April, Boucher made an audacious move. Rumored widely to be the next coach/GM for both the Canadiens and the national Olympic team, he publicly challenged the NHL to give him one year to and publicly challenged the NHL to give him one year of control to remove the red line and make perhaps one other change, staking his reputation that the result would be a superior product.

As we know, Boucher's phone never rang in response. Sam Pollock was chosen as GM of the Habs that summer, and Toe Blake occupied the bench role for several more years. Father David Bauer, transitioning from the bench to a management role for the Olympic team, preferred a player-coach for his replacement, and recruited Jackie McLeod. Later that year, Boucher offered a slightly altered version of his prior list of proposed changes:

frank-boucher-2.png


In late 1964, in the wake of the USSR's first gold medal, Boucher made a prescient observation: the Russians were still playing and perfecting a style of hockey they had learned from Canadians prior to the fall of the Iron Curtain... prior to the introduction of the red line. A style heavily focused on puck possession, crisply coordinated neutral zone passes, smooth entries across the blue line, and methodically working the puck toward the net. The Canadians were looking to turn dump-ins and chaotic forechecks into goalmouth scrambles and ugly goals. In Boucher's view, the Canadians needed to re-learn how to pass as well as the Russians, or they would be in for a hard battle for world supremacy.

Boucher continued his term as SJHL Commissioner for two more years, and oversaw that league's merger in 1968. In so doing, Boucher became the first Commissioner of what would eventually become today's WHL.

The NHL went to a 2-referee system in 2001.
The NHL shrank the neutral zone by 2 feet in 1990, and another 6 feet in 2005.
The NHL eliminated the red line for the purpose of allowing 2-line pases in 2005.
NHL referees are no longer encouraged to stop play for pucks frozen along the boards.

Slapshots remain legal.
 

overpass

Registered User
Jun 7, 2007
5,271
2,808
Great write-up on a lesser-known side of Frank Boucher! You have to say he was ahead of his time.

Interesting observation tying pre-red line hockey to the Soviet possession style. I would say you’d have to go back several years before the introduction of the red line, as dump and chase “ganging” hockey was widespread in the early 40s.

Boucher was an innovator in the NHL as well. When he coached the Cup-winning 1939-40 Rangers, he implemented an aggressive penalty kill with 3 forwards and 1 defenceman. Forwards were usually Neil and Mac Colville with Alex Shibicky, or Bryan Hextall, Phil Watson, and Dutch Hiller, and the defenceman was usually Art Coulter or Ott Heller. They played opposing power play units even, with 13 SHG and 13 PPG against between the regular season and playoffs.
 

Professor What

Registered User
Sep 16, 2020
2,334
1,982
Gallifrey
Nice research there. Some of that I wouldn't want to see enacted (slap shots, obviously, the tripping stuff, and no checking three feet from the boards could get messy), but a lot of that was very forward thinking. I do think that the no icing unless down two men idea is interesting. I don't know how well I think it would work, but it would be pretty interesting to see how it would play out in some sort of experiment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelhockey

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,346
139,145
Bojangles Parking Lot
Great write-up on a lesser-known side of Frank Boucher! You have to say he was ahead of his time.

Interesting observation tying pre-red line hockey to the Soviet possession style. I would say you’d have to go back several years before the introduction of the red line, as dump and chase “ganging” hockey was widespread in the early 40s.

One thing I found interesting about this whole episode is that Boucher was willing to take on the whole hockey establishment in defense of the "old time" game. We remember Boucher as a guy who commanded a lot of respect in the same vein as a Beliveau or Yzerman, but clearly he was up against the power structure of organized hockey on this subject, and was subject to some pretty harsh pushback at the time.

His fundamental issue with the direction of the game (bearing in mind this was in the early 1960s, golden era of the O6) was the focus on strong skating, cutting directly to the net, and just forcing the puck over the blue line. He regarded that style of the play, much like the gimmicky slapshot, as fundamentally unsound and a substitute for developing real puck skills.

Within a decade of all this hullabaloo, the hockey establishment was thrown into crisis by the rise of European hockey... the NHL fell into an age of extremely low-quality competition... and before long we were on track for the Dead Puck Era and its aftershock of needing to completely rewrite the rulebook. Boucher wasn't right about everything, but he was one of the very early voices to key in on the problematic trajectory of the game. What's fascinating to me is that he saw those issues coming because of his grounding in pre-WWII hockey, which seems so alien to us now, but obviously has certain important structural elements in common with today's style of game.
 

Yozhik v tumane

Registered User
Jan 2, 2019
1,847
1,945
Great post!

Yeah, striking how he was lashing out over the same developments within the game we saw drawn to their apex some 50 years later, and the changes he predicted.

Even if the slap shot never was prohibited, it’s seen its heyday, and it arguably pulled some weight in terms of goaltender development. Sounds kind of amusing to me now, the distaste towards the newfangled slap shot (especially from a non-goalie), but in a way I can see where it’s coming from.

I do think that the no icing unless down two men idea is interesting. I don't know how well I think it would work, but it would be pretty interesting to see how it would play out in some sort of experiment.

I’ve had that same thought too, of what it would mean disallowing icing from the penalty kill, but figured the issue would be that teams still may prefer to take the icing and resulting defensive zone faceoff over risking to hand over possession in the defensive end, hence a tediously prolonged situation constantly blown asunder.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelhockey

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,543
4,949
Very interesting. Boucher had already proposed that icing the puck should not be allowed for the shorthanded team back in 1958 when he still though there wasn't much wrong with the game if it was played according to the puck. But then, that qualifier actually indicates that Boucher wasn't entirely happy with the state of pro hockey.

Boucher.jpg


(Saskatoon Star-Phoenix, Jan 9 1958)

And do I remember coming across that complimentary comment by Boucher on the Soviets and how they reminded him of his own playing days. Nostalgic musings by an old man, one could say, but if we consider the impression the Soviets made on in the NHL in the 1970s and beyond, it was actually quite farsighted.

Interesting observation tying pre-red line hockey to the Soviet possession style. I would say you’d have to go back several years before the introduction of the red line, as dump and chase “ganging” hockey was widespread in the early 40s.

Ganging hockey for sure, but dump and chase? I was under the impression that passing the puck over either blue line wasn't allowed before the red line was introduced.
 

Professor What

Registered User
Sep 16, 2020
2,334
1,982
Gallifrey
I’ve had that same thought too, of what it would mean disallowing icing from the penalty kill, but figured the issue would be that teams still may prefer to take the icing and resulting defensive zone faceoff over risking to hand over possession in the defensive end, hence a tediously prolonged situation constantly blown asunder.

Yeah, that could definitely be a potential issue. I guess it would depend on how well teams adjusted to chipping over the blue line. It would make a good minor league preseason experiment, imo. That way, we could see what happened without making it detrimental to the game. That said, I don't see it ever happening.
 

Yozhik v tumane

Registered User
Jan 2, 2019
1,847
1,945
Yeah, that could definitely be a potential issue. I guess it would depend on how well teams adjusted to chipping over the blue line. It would make a good minor league preseason experiment, imo. That way, we could see what happened without making it detrimental to the game. That said, I don't see it ever happening.

I’ve had the sense that players in general have gotten better at chipping pucks out without causing an icing over the years, so I’m not sure it would become as much of an issue nowadays when hockey teams are more wary of taking penalties as well. I’ve rewatched the heavily edited down in length deciding game of the 1996 Swedish Championship finals a few times (my team’s only championship to date!) and they blast the puck out of their own end with slap shots each opportunity they have with the puck on the penalty kill. And they couldn’t care less about avoiding penalties, there wasn’t much of 5 on 5 hockey played that game, probably took 4 hours to get through with all the interruptions, despite no icing on the penalty kill. But yeah, I digress…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Professor What

overpass

Registered User
Jun 7, 2007
5,271
2,808
  • Like
Reactions: Yozhik v tumane

I Hate Blake Coleman

Bandwagon Burner
Jul 22, 2008
23,674
7,596
Saskatchewan
Boucher seems to have some reasonable suggestions but the opposition to the slap shot just screams sour grapes to me. It's kinda like the ongoing discussion, such as Zegras' lacrosse goals but predating his time in the NHL, about creative and unconventional ways to score goals.
 

overpass

Registered User
Jun 7, 2007
5,271
2,808
Charlie Conacher was a critic of dump and chase hockey in 1957. He believed the NHL game was focused far too much on size, speed, and dump and chase hockey rather than skilled hockey. And like Boucher, he also thought old-time hockey was more skilled and more watchable.

"How I’d make hockey a better game” | Maclean's | APRIL 27, 1957
Their rule changes have eliminated most of the colorful players, reduced the need for stickhandlers and pattern passing, curtailed the number of clear-cut goals, and introduced a breed of player who needs small artistic qualities if he has a strong pair of legs and an ability to clutch an opposing player by the sweater, arms or head and jam him against the boards. The game’s greatest evil is the rule that permits players to shoot the puck from the centre red line to any point in the other team’s area and then chase after it.

Shooting from centre eliminates clean body checking by defensemen who must turn and rush for the loose puck. It relieves the forward lines of the need to work the puck toward the other team’s goal by passing or stickhandling—it’s simpler just to shoot it in-—and creates the endless scrambles in the goal area. In the days when the emphasis was on immediate control of the puck and swift precise pattern plays, hockey was a better and easier game to look at.


Conacher also thought that amateur hockey had been corrupted by the NHL influence, focusing on speed, size, and systems instead of skill.

In 1942 I told Frankie Selke, now the managing director of the Montreal Canadiens and then the assistant manager of the Toronto Maple Leafs, that if the pro teams didn’t keep their noses out of amateur hockey they’d ruin it. Well, they’ve ruined it, and I only mention the date of the Selke conversation so that I won't be accused of second guessing.

...

To my mind, the reason colorful players have disappeared to be replaced by a faceless scurrying band is that the amateur associations have permitted the professionals to bulldoze them into accepting NHL methods as their methods. Young players are regimented into a standardized mold where they play NHL rules and follow NHL theories of attack and defense. Kids rarely play shinny any more, weaving in and out with a puck, learning to stickhandle and skate in a helter-skelter incubator that hatches their natural ability. They’re so completely organized and regimented that they don’t get a chance to develop any individual characteristics. But you can’t regiment talent. How could you develop an artist, say, if you took him when he was twelve and for the next eight years told him how to put every daub of paint, every stroke of his brush, on the canvas? If they want kids to develop their skills the amateurs ought to throw out all those fancy red lines and circles they’ve got on the rinks these days, toss a puck onto the ice and let the players learn the rudiments of passing the puck, stickhandling and skating. Then the good ones would begin to emerge, just as the Howes and the Richards and the Beliveaus have emerged—and, incidentally, have you ever watched two more unorthodox hockey players than Howe and Richard? These two break every rule that today’s regimentalists are instilling into kids, and they’re two of the alltime greats. Positional play? Howe wanders all over the ice. Backcheck? Richard detests it. I've heard a lot of people say that all Richard can do is put the puck in the net. That’s like saying that all Ted Williams can do is hit. If putting the puck in the net isn’t the most important thing in hockey, why do they keep score?

I've posted this before.

1956 Macleans article on hockey scouting - They Beat the Bushes for Stars
 

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,543
4,949

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
7,687
7,410
Regina, Saskatchewan
How soon after the forward pass rule did we start to see dump and chase?

Edit: I should have Googled it first

From Ken Dryden's book "The Game":



The rule changes Dryden is referring to are the gradual admission of the forward pass (late 1920s to early 1930s) and the introduction of the icing rule (1937).

He continues to say the following about the 1940s:
 
Last edited:

VanIslander

A 19-year ATDer on HfBoards
Sep 4, 2004
35,356
6,512
South Korea
[MOD]

Selke in his autobiography described Charlie Conacher as part of the problem, why the talented Leafs of the 1930s won so few cups: they loved to score and didn't want to do the work when they didn't have the puck. He identified three Leafs in particular, Charlie being one of them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: jigglysquishy

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,845
85,386
Vancouver, BC
Boucher's views are a fascinating pretty-even mix of really interesting, progressive thinking and absolute dinosaur thinking and a desire to return to the past.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seventieslord

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,543
4,949
I was thinking of the 1942 Cup finals in particular. It’s not uncommon to find “dump and chase” in reference to that series. For example:

How Jack Adams Cost the Detroit Red Wings the 1942 Stanley Cup

Stories You Should Know: 1942 Stanley Cup Finals

Thanks, will read!

Those are very interesting. I'd love to see contemporary reports.

Compare Ken Dryden ("The Game"):
Less skilled passers, unable to penetrate a packed defense, made no pretense of passing, instead shooting the puck ahead of them to the corners, and chasing after it. It was what we later came to disparage as the dump-and-chase style, and it was in these early war years that it had its systematic beginnings.

Also:

In The Game, Dryden has a section where he basically overviews the game in terms of how and why it was played by era from the beginnings of the sport, to the mid 70s. The relevant pages are 243 up to the middle of 256.

According to Drydens research, many felt that the 1930s were significantly more skilled (the passing & playmaking skills of the Cooks for the Rangers are often mentioned), but that in spite of the introduction of the forward pass and the centre red line, (both innovations which were meant to increase offence and creativity) hockey in the 1940s trended strongly towards mindless dump & chase tactics, and issues with relevant parts of the ice being choked with too many bodies are often mentioned.

Recently I was surprised that there seems to have been an earlier version of dump and chase though:

In 1919-20 there was no icing and no forward pass, so dump and chase was a common tactic and the speediest team could usually beat their opponent to the puck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: overpass

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,346
139,145
Bojangles Parking Lot
Recently I was surprised that there seems to have been an earlier version of dump and chase though:

If I'm reading this right, it's referring to the skill of "lifting" that's referred to in early game reports. Basically, it's a hockey version of punting. Send the puck through the air to the other end, and force the other team to retreat and get it.

Imagining that from the other team's standpoint, and keeping in mind they couldn't make forward passes, one can imagine how difficult it would be to handle this tactic. It's one reason (and a very good one) why defensemen didn't wander too far up ice in that era. Imagine having to sprint the length of the ice and then turn around and beat a forecheck with no passing targets...
 

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
13,539
8,171
NYC
www.hockeyprospect.com
I wonder what the preferred way of lifting was done. Because without a curve, I'm not sure how it would go. Like, I can do the toe to heel flip that a lot of guys do now - I think Kris Letang is one of the better guys at it. It pops the puck way up, but it lands with almost back spin usually...I'm not sure I can pull that off with a flat blade and a wood stick or not...
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,346
139,145
Bojangles Parking Lot
I wonder what the preferred way of lifting was done. Because without a curve, I'm not sure how it would go. Like, I can do the toe to heel flip that a lot of guys do now - I think Kris Letang is one of the better guys at it. It pops the puck way up, but it lands with almost back spin usually...I'm not sure I can pull that off with a flat blade and a wood stick or not...

Flat blades, and also the way they had to stand almost upright to keep their balance on those old skates. They were getting a lot less leverage on the puck than what we're used to.

My mental image is that the puck probably didn't get all that far off the ice... probably more of a shallow arc. Unless they had Popeye's forearms.
 

overpass

Registered User
Jun 7, 2007
5,271
2,808
I wonder what the preferred way of lifting was done. Because without a curve, I'm not sure how it would go. Like, I can do the toe to heel flip that a lot of guys do now - I think Kris Letang is one of the better guys at it. It pops the puck way up, but it lands with almost back spin usually...I'm not sure I can pull that off with a flat blade and a wood stick or not...

I think Win, Tie, or Wrangle went into some detail on this. From memory I think they said Weldy Young was known for his backhand lifts that could almost hit the rafters. Possibly exaggerated of course.

My sense is that lifting was less of an offensive move than your dump and chase from the offensive blue line or red line. Used to get the puck out of trouble, or like a punt in football to trade possession for territory.

There’s a mention of lifts in this article.

Klondikers: Dawson City’s Stanley Cup Challenge ... (by Tim Falconer)

The second half started with the points and cover points trading long lifts. But it quickly became clear the Klondikers lacked the necessary conditioning and were now too tired to compete with the champions.

Since conditioning is brought up, it occurs to me that in a time when players played the full game, they wouldn’t have the wind to repeatedly execute a modern style dump and chase. Which is why lifting usually led to a change in possession.
 
Last edited:

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,543
4,949
If I'm reading this right, it's referring to the skill of "lifting" that's referred to in early game reports. Basically, it's a hockey version of punting. Send the puck through the air to the other end, and force the other team to retreat and get it.

Imagining that from the other team's standpoint, and keeping in mind they couldn't make forward passes, one can imagine how difficult it would be to handle this tactic. It's one reason (and a very good one) why defensemen didn't wander too far up ice in that era. Imagine having to sprint the length of the ice and then turn around and beat a forecheck with no passing targets...

My sense is that lifting was less of an offensive move than your dump and chase from the offensive blue line or red line. Used to get the puck out of trouble, or like a punt in football to trade possession for territory.

(...)

Since conditioning is brought up, it occurs to me that in a time when players played the full game, they wouldn’t have the wind to repeatedly execute a modern style dump and chase. Which is why lifting usually led to a change in possession.

All of this makes a lot of sense.

We really need a hockey equivalent of this book:

3621358.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelhockey

overpass

Registered User
Jun 7, 2007
5,271
2,808
I found a mention of Frank Boucher advocating for eliminating the red line in 1951. Along with Art Ross, one of the original hockey innovators.

Montreal Gazette, April 13, 1951
The Montreal Gazette - Google News Archive Search

Art Ross is the man who suggests that the red line be removed from centre ice and that a team be allowed to pass a puck right up to the other team’s blue line. He also wants to make it compulsory that the puck be carried over the blue line and not shot in, which he thinks would eliminate the ganging in the end zones. Frank Boucher may be the only hockey executive who endorses the idea.

“It’s the ganging in the end zones that makes the game deteriorate into shinny,” he said. “Anything that will eliminate it is an improvement.”

But Frank Selke, Jack Adams and Conn Smythe are all for maintaining the status quo.

“There isn’t anything with the present rules of hockey as long as they are enforced,” says Frank Selke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tarheelhockey

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Great Britain vs Finland
    Great Britain vs Finland
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $400.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Kazakhstan vs Slovakia
    Kazakhstan vs Slovakia
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Darmstadt vs Hoffenheim
    Darmstadt vs Hoffenheim
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Canada vs Denmark
    Canada vs Denmark
    Wagers: 2
    Staked: $1,010.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • France vs Latvia
    France vs Latvia
    Wagers: 3
    Staked: $1,461.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad